Abstract
Virtual Organizations should evolve along time in order to face with unforeseen changing situations. This evolution implies the adaptation of norms, so agents must be able to consider dynamic norms which guide agent behaviours in their decision making processes. With this aim, this paper proposes the employment of argumentation protocols and schemes in order to allow agents to reach agreements inside dynamic organizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: A landscape of agent systems for the real world. Technical report, Inst. Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University (2006)
Mcburney, P., Parsons, S.: Dialogue games in multi-agent systems. Informal Logic 22, 2002 (2002)
Reed, C., Walton, D.: Argumentation schemes in dialogue. In: Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground, pp. 1–11 (2007)
Walton, D.: Appeal to Expert Opinion. Penn State Press (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Criado, N., Heras, S., Argente, E., Julián, V. (2010). Normative Argumentation. In: Demazeau, Y., et al. Trends in Practical Applications of Agents and Multiagent Systems. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 71. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12433-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12433-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12432-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12433-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)