Abstract
We study two related problems in non-preemptive scheduling and packing of malleable tasks with precedence constraints to minimize the makespan. We distinguish the scheduling variant, in which we allow the free choice of processors, and the packing variant, in which a task must be assigned to a contiguous subset of processors.
For precedence constraints of bounded width, we completely resolve the complexity status for any particular problem setting concerning width bound and number of processors, and give polynomial-time algorithms with best possible performance. For both, scheduling and packing malleable tasks, we present an FPTAS for the NP-hard problem variants and exact algorithms for all remaining special cases. To obtain the positive results, we do not require the common monotonous penalty assumption on processing times, whereas our hardness results hold even when assuming this restriction.
With the close relation between contiguous scheduling and strip packing, our FPTAS is the first (and best possible) constant factor approximation for (malleable) strip packing under special precedence constraints.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Augustine, J., Banerjee, S., Irani, S.: Strip packing with precedence constraints and strip packing with release times. In: Proceedings of SPAA, pp. 180–189 (2006)
Błażewicz, J., Liu, Z.: Scheduling multiprocessor tasks with chain constraints. European Journal of Operational Research 94(2), 231–241 (1996)
Dilworth, R.P.: A decomposition theorem for partially ordered sets. Annals of Mathematics 51(1), 161–166 (1950)
Drozdowski, M.: Scheduling multiprocessor tasks: an overview. European Journal of Operational Research 94(2), 215–230 (1996)
Duin, C.W., Sluis, E.V.: On the complexity of adjacent resource scheduling. Journal of Scheduling 9(1), 49–62 (2006)
Fulkerson, D.R.: Note on Dilworth’s decomposition theorem for partially ordered sets. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 7(4), 701–702 (1956)
Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York (1979)
Grigoriev, A., Woeginger, G.J.: Project scheduling with irregular costs: complexity, approximability, and algorithms. Acta Informatica 41(2–3), 83–97 (2004)
Günther, E.: Bin Scheduling: Partitionieren verformbarer Jobs mit Nebenbedingungen. Master’s thesis, Technische Universität Berlin (2008) (in German)
Jansen, K., Thöle, R.: Approximation algorithms for scheduling parallel jobs: Breaking the approximation ratio of 2. In: Aceto, L., Damgård, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Walukiewicz, I. (eds.) ICALP 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5125, pp. 234–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Jansen, K., Zhang, H.: An approximation algorithm for scheduling malleable tasks under general precedence constraints. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 2(3), 416–434 (2006)
Lepère, R., Mounié, G., Trystram, D.: An approximation algorithm for scheduling trees of malleable tasks. European Journal of Operational Research 142(2), 242–249 (2002)
Lepère, R., Trystram, D., Woeginger, G.J.: Approximation algorithms for scheduling malleable tasks under precedence constraints. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science 13(4), 613–627 (2002)
Leung, J.-T.: Handbook of Scheduling: Algorithms, Models, and Performance Analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2004)
Möhring, R.H.: Computationally tractable classes of ordered sets. In: Rival, I. (ed.) Algorithms and Order, pp. 105–194. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1989)
Steiner, G.: On the complexity of dynamic programming for sequencing problems with precedence constraints. Annals of Operations Research 26, 103–123 (1990)
Turek, J., Wolf, J., Yu, P.: Approximate algorithms for scheduling parallelizable tasks. In: Proceedings of SPAA, pp. 323–332 (1992)
Verriet, J.: The complexity of scheduling graphs of bounded width subject to non-zero communication delays. Technical Report UU-CS-1997-01, Utrecht University (1997)
Woeginger, G.J.: When does a dynamic programming formulation guarantee the existence of a fully polynomial time approximation scheme (FPTAS)? INFORMS Journal on Computing 12(1), 57–74 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Günther, E., König, F.G., Megow, N. (2010). Scheduling and Packing Malleable Tasks with Precedence Constraints of Bounded Width. In: Bampis, E., Jansen, K. (eds) Approximation and Online Algorithms. WAOA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5893. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12450-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12450-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12449-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12450-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)