Skip to main content

Activity Control in Application Landscapes A Further Approach to Improving Maintainability of Distributed Application Landscapes

  • Conference paper
Cloud Computing (CloudComp 2009)

Abstract

The system administration has been waiting for a long time for procedures and mechanism for more control over process activities within complex application landscapes. New challenges come up due to the use of linked up software applications to implement business scenarios. Numerous business processes exchange data across complex application landscapes, for that they use various applications, retrieve and store data. The underlying technology has to provide a stable environment maintaining diverse software, databases and operating system components. The challenge is to keep the distributed application environment under control at any given time. This paper describes a steering mechanism to control complex application landscapes, in order to support system administration in their daily business. Process Activity Control, PAC is an approach to get activities under central control. PAC is the next reasonable step to gaining more transparency and visibility to improving system maintenance of Cloud Computing environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Daute, O.: Introducing Real-Time Business CASE Database, Approach to improving system maintenance of complex application landscapes. In: ICEIS 11th Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daute, O.: Representation of Business Information Flow with an Extension for UML. In: ICEIS 6th Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Economist Intelligence Unit: Coming to grips with IT risk, A report from the Economist Intelligence Unit, White Paper (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gartner Research Group: TCO, Total Cost of Ownership, Information Technology Research (1987), http://www.gartner.com

  5. ITTL, IT Infrastructure Library, ITSMF, Information Technology Service Management Forum, http://www.itsmf.net

  6. Kobbacy, Khairy, A.H., Murthy, Prabhakar, D.N.: Complex System Maintenance Handbook. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mei, L.: More Tales of Clouds: Software Engineering Research Issues from the Cloud Application Perspective. In: 33rd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Papazoglou, M., Heuvel, J.: Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues, Paper. International Journal on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB) 16, 389–415(2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosemann, M.: Process-oriented Administration of Enterprise Systems, ARC SPIRT project, Queensland University of Technology (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sarkar, S., Kak, A.C., Nagaraja, N.S.: Metrics for Analyzing Module Interactions in Large Software Systems. In: The 12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schelp, J.: Winter, Robert: Business Application Design and Enterprise Service Design: A Comparison. Int. J. Service Sciences 3/4 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. SOA: Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture Committee Specification (2006), http://www.oasis-open.org

  13. Stamati, T.: Investigating The Life Cycle Of Legacy Systems Migration. In: European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS), Alicante Spain (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Svatoš, O.: Conceptual Process Modeling Language: Regulative Approach, Department of Information Technologies, University of Economics, Czech Republic (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. TOGAF, 9.0: The Open Group Architecture Framework, Vendor-and technology-neutral consortium, The Open GROUP (2009), http://www.togaf.org

  16. UML: Unified Modeling Language, Not-for-profit computer industry consortium, Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org

  17. Vouk, M.: Cloud Computing — Issues, Research and Implementations. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (ITI 2008), pp. 31–40 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Daute, O., Conrad, S. (2010). Activity Control in Application Landscapes A Further Approach to Improving Maintainability of Distributed Application Landscapes. In: Avresky, D.R., Diaz, M., Bode, A., Ciciani, B., Dekel, E. (eds) Cloud Computing. CloudComp 2009. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 34. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12636-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12636-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12635-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12636-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics