Abstract
Pair Programming has often been reported to be beneficial in software projects. To better understand where these benefits come from we evaluate the aspect of intra-pair communication. Under the assumption that the benefits stem from the information being exchanged, it is important to analyze the types of information being communicated. Based on the Goal Question Metric method we derive a set of relevant metrics and apply them in an eXtreme Programming class room project. Data covering a total of 22.9 hours of intra-pair communication was collected. We found that only 7% of the conversations were off-topic (e.g. private), 11% about requirements, 14% about design, and 68% about implementation details (e.g. syntax). Accordingly, a great share of the information being exchanged in Pair Programming is on a low level of abstraction. These results represent a first data point on what kind of information is communicated to what extent during Pair Programming.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)
Coman, I.D., Sillitti, A., Succi, G.: Investigating the Usefulness of Pair-Programming in a Mature Agile Team. In: XP, pp. 127–136 (2008)
Hulkko, H., Abrahamsson, P.: A Multiple Case Study on the Impact of Pair Programming on Product Quality. In: ICSE 2005, pp. 495–504. ACM, New York (2005)
Cockburn, A., Williams, L.: The Costs and Benefits of Pair Programming. In: Extreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Engineering XP 2000, pp. 223–247 (2000)
McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H., Fernald, J.: The Effects of Pair-Programming on Performance in an Introductory Programming Course. In: SIGCSE ’02: Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 38–42. ACM Press, New York (2002)
Lindvall, M., Basili, V., Boehm, B., Costa, P., Dangle, K., Shull, F., Tesoriero, R., Williams, L., Zelkowitz, M.: Empirical findings in agile methods. In: Wells, D., Williams, L. (eds.) XP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2418, p. 197. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Gallis, H., Arisholm, E., Dybå, T.: An Initial Framework for Research on Pair Programming. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE 2003), pp. 132–142 (2003)
Ally, M., Darroch, F., Toleman, M.: A framework for understanding the factors influencing pair programming success. In: Baumeister, H., Marchesi, M., Holcombe, M. (eds.) XP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3556, pp. 82–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Dutoit, A.H., Bruegge, B.: Communication Metrics for Software Development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(8), 615–628 (1998)
Sfetsos, P., Stamelos, I., Angelis, L., Deligiannis, I.: Investigating the Impact of Personality Types on Communication and Collaboration-Viability in Pair Programming – An Empirical Study. In: Abrahamsson, P., Marchesi, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4044, pp. 43–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Bryant, S., Romero, P., du Boulay, B.: The Collaborative Nature of Pair Programming. In: Abrahamsson, P., Marchesi, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4044, pp. 53–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Briand, L.C., Differding, C.M., Rombach, H.D.: Practical Guidelines for Measurement-Based Process Improvement. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 2(4), 253–280 (1996)
Williams, L., Kessler, R.R., Cunningham, W., Jeffries, R.: Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming. IEEE Software 17, 19–25 (2000)
Knauss, E., Boustani, C.E., Flohr, T.: Investigating the Impact of Software Requirements Specification Quality on Project Success. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2009), Oulu, Finland. LNBIB, pp. 28–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Stapel, K., Lübke, D., Knauss, E.: Best Practices in eXtreme Programming Course Design. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2008), Leipzig, Germany, May 2008, pp. 769–776. ACM, New York (2008)
Williams, L., Kessler, R.: Pair Programming Illuminated. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
Dajda, J., Dobrowolski, G.: How to Build Support for Distributed Pair Programming. In: Concas, G., Damiani, E., Scotto, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4536, pp. 70–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stapel, K., Knauss, E., Schneider, K., Becker, M. (2010). Towards Understanding Communication Structure in Pair Programming. In: Sillitti, A., Martin, A., Wang, X., Whitworth, E. (eds) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 48. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13054-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13054-0_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13053-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13054-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)