Abstract
Persuasive technology can take the form of a social agent that persuades people to change behavior or attitudes. However, like any persuasive technology, persuasive social agents might trigger psychological reactance, which can lead to restoration behavior. The current study investigated whether interacting with a persuasive robot can cause psychological reactance. Additionally, we investigated whether goal congruency plays a role in psychological reactance. Participants programmed a washing machine while a robot gave threatening advice. Confirming expectations, participants experienced more psychological reactance when receiving high-threatening advice compared to low-threatening advice. Moreover, when the robot gave high-threatening advice and expressed an incongruent goal, participants reported the highest level of psychological reactance (on an anger measure). Finally, high-threatening advice led to more restoration, and this relationship was partially mediated by psychological reactance. Overall, results imply that under certain circumstances persuasive technology can trigger opposite effects, especially when people have incongruent goal intentions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations. J. of Pers. and Soc. Psycholog. 51, 1173–1182 (1986)
Brehm, J.W.: A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press, New York (1966)
Brehm, S.S., Brehm, J.W.: Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press, New York (1981)
Buller, D.B., Borland, R., Burgoon, M.: Impact of Behavioral Intention on Effectiveness of Message Features: Evidence From the Family Sun Safety Project. Hum. Commun. Res. 24(3), 433–453 (1998)
Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E., Grandpre, J., Voulodakis, M.: Revisiting the Theory of Psychological Reactance: Communicating Threats to Attitudinal Freedom. In: Dillard, J.P. (ed.) The Persuasion Handbook: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications, Thousands Oaks (2002)
Dillard, J.P., Shen, L.: On the Nature of Reactance and Its Role in Persuasive Health Communication. Commun. Monogr. 72, 144–168 (2005)
Grandpre, J., Alvaro, E.M., Burgoon, M., Miller, C.H., Hall, J.R.: Adolescent Reactance and Anti-Smoking Campaigns: A Theoretical Approach. Health Commun. 15(3), 349–366 (2003)
Miller, C.H., Lane, L.T., Deatrick, L.M., Young, A.M., Potts, K.A.: Psychological Reactance and Promotional Health Messages: The Effects of Controlling Language, Lexical Concreteness, and the Restoration of Freedom. Hum. Commun. Res. 33, 219–240 (2007)
Quick, B.L., Considine, J.R.: Examining the Use of Forceful Language When Designing Exercise Persuasive Messages for Adults: A Test of Conceptualizing Reactance Arousal as a Two-Step Process. Health Commun. 23, 483–491 (2008)
Quick, B.L., Stephenson, M.T.: Further Evidence That Psychological Reactance Can be Modelled as a Combination of Anger and Negative Cognitions. Commun. Res. 34(3), 255–276 (2007)
Rains, S.A., Turner, M.M.: Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communication: A Test and Extension of the Intertwined Model. Human Commun. Res. 33, 241–269 (2007)
Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, New York (2002)
Roubroeks, M.A.J., Midden, C.J.H., Ham, J.R.C.: Does It Make a Difference Who Tells You What To Do? Exploring the Effects of Social Agency on Psychological Reactance. In: Chatterjee, S., Dev, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology 2009, Claremont, California, April 26 -29, article No.: 15. ACM, New York (2009)
Silvia, P.J.: Deflecting Reactance: The Role of Similarity in Increasing Compliance and Reducing Resistance. Basic and Appl. Soc. Psych. 27(3), 277–284 (2005)
Van der Ploeg, H.M., Van Buuren, E.T., Van Brummelen, P.: The Factor Structure of the State-Trait Anger Scale. Psych. Rep. 63, 978 (1988)
Wansink, B., Ray, M.L., Batra, R.: Increasing Cognitive Response Sensitivity. J. of Advert. 23(2), 62–74 (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Roubroeks, M.A.J., Ham, J.R.C., Midden, C.J.H. (2010). The Dominant Robot: Threatening Robots Cause Psychological Reactance, Especially When They Have Incongruent Goals. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13225-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13226-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)