Skip to main content

Component Composition Using Feature Models

  • Conference paper
Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6092))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 937 Accesses

Abstract

In general, components provide and require services and two components are bound if the first component provides a service required by the second component. However, certain variability in services – w.r.t. how and which functionality is provided or required – cannot be described using standard interface description languages. If this variability is relevant when selecting a matching component then human interaction is required to decide which components can be bound. We propose to use feature models for making this variability explicit and (re-)enabling automatic component binding. In our approach, feature models are one part of service specifications. This enables to declaratively specify which service variant is provided by a component. By referring to a service’s variation points, a component that requires a specific service can list the requirements on the desired variant. Using these specifications, a component environment can then determine if a binding of the components exists that satisfies all requirements. The prototypical environment Columbus demonstrates the feasibility of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, A.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Technical report, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S., Eisenecker, U.: Staged configuration through specialization and multilevel configuration of feature models. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 10(2) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, K., Kang, K.C., Lee, J.: Concepts and guidelines of feature modeling for product line software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Reuse: Methods, Techniques, and Tools, pp. 62–77. Springer, London (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Batory, D.: Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas. In: Obbink, H., Pohl, K. (eds.) SPLC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3714. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen, E., Curbera, F., Meredith, G., Weerawarana, S.: Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1. W3C (March 2001), http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315

  6. Hadley, M.J.: Web Application Description Language (WADL). Sun Microsystems Inc. (February 2009), https://wadl.dev.java.net/wadl20090202.pdf

  7. Nadalin, A., Goodner, M., Gudgin, M., Barbir, A., Granqvist, H.: WS-SecurityPolicy 1.3. OASIS (February 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nadalin, A., Goodner, M., Gudgin, M., Barbir, A., Granqvist, H.: WS-Trust 1.4. OASIS (February 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nadalin, A., Goodner, M., Gudgin, M., Barbir, A., Granqvist, H.: WS-SecureConversation 1.4. OASIS (February 2009), http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/v1.4/os/ws-secureconversation-1.4-spec-os.html

  10. aliCE Research Group: Tuprolog, http://www.alice.unibo.it/tuProlog/

  11. Fowler, M.: Inversion of control containers and the dependency injection pattern (January 2004), http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html

  12. Gosling, J., Joy, B., Steele, G., Bracha, G.: Java Language Specification, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Forman, I.R., Conner, M.H., Danforth, S.H., Raper, L.K.: Release-to-release binary compatibility in som. SIGPLAN Not. 30(10), 426–438 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Robak, S., Franczyk, B.: Modeling web services variability with feature diagrams. In: Chaudhri, A.B., Jeckle, M., Rahm, E., Unland, R. (eds.) NODe-WS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2593. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Topaloglu, N.Y., Capilla, R.: Modeling the variability of web services from a pattern point of view. In: Zhang, L.-J., Jeckle, M. (eds.) ECOWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3250, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, Y., Doh, K.G.: Adaptable webservices modeling using variability analysis. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rao, J., Su, X.: A survey of automated web service composition methods. In: Cardoso, J., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) SWSWPC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3387, pp. 43–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Keller, A., Ludwig, H.: The WSLA framework: Specifying and monitoring service level agreements for web services. Journal of Network and Systems Management 11(1), 57–81 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ludwig, H., Keller, A., Dan, A., King, R.P., Franck, R.: Web Service Level Agreement (WSLA) Language Specification 1.0. IBM Corporation (January 2003), http://www.research.ibm.com/wsla/WSLASpecV1-20030128.pdf

  20. Frølund, S., Koistinen, J.: Qml: A lanugage for quality of service specification. Technical report, Software Technology Laboratory, HPL-98-10 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vedamuthu, A.S., Orchard, D., Hirsch, F., Hondo, M., Yendluri, P., Boubez, T.: Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework. W3C (September 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. van der Storm, T.: Variability and Component Composition. In: Bosch, J., Krueger, C. (eds.) ICOIN 2004 and ICSR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3107, pp. 157–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. The OSGi Alliance: OSGi Service Platform, Release 4, Version 4.0.1 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cervantes, H., Hall, R.: Automating service dependency management in a service-oriented component model. In: Proceedings of the 6th ICSE Workshop on CBSE: Automated Reasoning and Prediction. Carnegie Mellon University/Monash University, USA/Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yu, H.Q., Reiff-Marganiec, S.: Non-functional property based service selection: A survey and classification of approaches. In: 2nd Non Functional Properties and Service Level Agreements in Service Oriented Computing Workshop (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beuche, D.: Composition and Construction of Embedded Software Families. PhD thesis, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Czarnecki, K., Wasowski, A.: Feature diagrams and logics: There and back again. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Benavides, D., Trinidad, P., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Automated reasoning on feature models. In: Pastor, Ó., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 491–503. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eichberg, M., Klose, K., Mitschke, R., Mezini, M. (2010). Component Composition Using Feature Models. In: Grunske, L., Reussner, R., Plasil, F. (eds) Component-Based Software Engineering. CBSE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6092. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13238-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13238-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13237-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13238-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics