Skip to main content

Towards Deterministically Constructing Organizations Based on the Normalized Systems Approach

  • Conference paper
Global Perspectives on Design Science Research (DESRIST 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6105))

Abstract

Contemporary organizations need to be more agile to keep up with the swiftly changing business environment. This means that their organizational structure, business processes and information systems should evolve at the same pace. This proves to be quite a challenge due to the invasive nature of these changes and a lack of alignment between these artefacts. It has therefore been argued that more determinism is needed when engineering these artefacts. Recently, the normalized systems approach has been proposed to design information systems exhibiting proven evolvability. In this paper, we extend the approach’s basic principles to the related fields of Enterprise Architecture (EA) and Business Process Management (BPM). This study is part of ongoing design science research to incorporate determinism in the construction of an organization’s artefacts. Our results show that such approach is feasible and could increase traceability from the organizational level to the information systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baskerville, R.L., Wood-Harper, A.T.: A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology 11(3), 235–246 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharya, K., Gerede, C., Hull, R., Liu, R., Su, J.: Towards formal analysis of artifact-centric business process models. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 288–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Chesbrough, H., Spohrer, J.: A Research Manifesto for Services Science. Communications of the ACM 49(7), 35–40 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cleven, A., Gubler, P., Hüner, K.M.: Design Alternatives for the Evaluation of Design Science Research Artifacts. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2009). ACM Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Backer, M., Snoeck, M., Monsieur, G., Lemahieu, W., Dedene, G.: A scenario-based verification technique to assess the compatibility of collaborative business processes. Data and Knowledge Engineering 68(6), 531–551 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz, J.L.: The deep structure of business processes. Communications of the ACM 49(5), 58–64 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dietz, J.L.: Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Eick, S.G., Graves, T.L., Karr, A.F., Marron, J., Mockus, A.: Does Code Decay? Assessing the Evidence from Change Management Data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27(1), 1–12 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: What business process modelers can learn from programmers. Science of Computer Programming 65(1), 4–13 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holmström, J., Ketokivi, M., Hameri, A.P.: Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach. Decision Sciences 40(1), 65–87 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Klahr, D., Simon, H.A.: Studies of scientific discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin 125(5), 524–543 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kozina, M.: Evaluation of ARIS and Zachman Frameworks as Enterprise Architectures. Journal of Information and Organization Sciences 30(1) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Op ’t Land, M., Proper, E., Waage, M., Cloo, J., Steghuis, C.: Enterprise Architecture: Creating Value by Informed Governance, 1st edn. The Enterprise Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lankhorst, M.M.: Enterprise architecture modelling–the issue of integration. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18(4), 205–216 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehman, M.: Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution. Proceedings of the IEEE 68, 1060–1076 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lehman, M.M., Ramil, J.F.: Rules and Tools for Software Evolution Planning and Management. Annals of Software Engineering 11(1), 15–44 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leist, S., Zellner, G.: Evaluation of current architecture frameworks. In: SAC 2006: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pp. 1546–1553. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J.: Normalized Systems: Re-creating Information Technology Based on Laws for Software Evolvability. Koppa, Hasselt (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J., Ven, K.: Exploring the Concept of Systems Theoretic Stability as a Starting Point for a Unified Theory on Software Engineering. In: Mannaert, H., Ohta, T., Dini, C., Pellerin, R. (eds.) Proceedings of Third International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2008), pp. 360–366. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Seven process modeling guidelines (7pmg). Information and Software Technology 52(2), 127–136 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Middleton, P., Harper, K.: Organizational alignment: a precondition for information systems success? Journal of Change Management 4(4), 327–338 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Neumann, S.: Strategic Information Systems: Competition Through Information Technologies. Macmillan College Publishing Company, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parnas, D.L.: On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Communications of the ACM 15(12), 1053–1058 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45–77 (2007–2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pereira, C.M., Sousa, P.: A Method to define an Enterprise Architecture using the Zachman Framework. In: SAC 2004: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pp. 1366–1371. ACM, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy – Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A.S., Grover, V.: Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms. MIS Quarterly 27(2), 237–263 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schekkerman, J.: How to survive in the jungle of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks. Trafford, Victoria (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Silver, B.: BPMN: Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press, Aptos (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Van Nuffel, D., Mannaert, H., De Backer, C., Verelst, J.: Deriving Normalized Systems elements from business process models. In: Boness, K. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, pp. 27–32. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Winter, R.: Guest editorial - Design Science Research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 17(5), 470–475 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Zachman, J.A.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Sys. J. 26(3), 276–292 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao, J.L., Tanniru, M., Zhang, L.J.: Services computing as the foundation of enterprise agility: Overview of recent advances and introduction to the special issue. Information Systems Frontiers 9(1), 1–8 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Van Nuffel, D., Huysmans, P., Bellens, D., Ven, K. (2010). Towards Deterministically Constructing Organizations Based on the Normalized Systems Approach. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds) Global Perspectives on Design Science Research. DESRIST 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6105. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13334-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13335-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics