Abstract
In this paper we develop a project management (PM) perspective on design science research (DSR). We account for the increasing amount of DSR projects that are emerging in public-private research collaborations and that align both business needs and research rigor. In addition to the application of sound research methodologies, the successful management of the work relations constitutes an important success factor for DSR projects. Hence the need emerges for professional project management. However, certain features such as creativity, uncertainty in terms of the research method and outcome, and research rigor complicate the application of standard PM approaches and make certain adaptations necessary. The goal of this paper is to identify a set of characteristics specific to DSR projects and to analyse their implications for selecting and adapting established project management standards. For evaluation purposes, we are using the PMBOKĀ® Guide by the Project Management Institute which is commonly accepted and widely used in practice and academia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
vom Brocke, J., Buddendick, C.: Reusable Conceptual Models. Requirements Based on the Design Science Research Paradigm. In: International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST), Claremont, CA, USA (2006)
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in Information Systems research. MIS QuarterlyĀ 28, 75ā105 (2004)
March, S.T., Smith, G.G.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support SystemsĀ 15, 251ā266 (1995)
Erno-Kjolhede, E.: Project management theory and the management of research projects. In: MPP Working Paper (ed.), vol.Ā 3. Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen (2000)
Dvir, D., Shenhar, A., Alkaher, S.: From a single discipline product to a multidisciplinary system: Adapting the right style to the right project. Systems EngineeringĀ 6, 123ā134 (2003)
Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D.: How projects differ and what to do about it. In: Morris, P.W.G., Pinto, J.K. (eds.) The Wiley guide to project, program and portfolio management, pp. 1265ā1286. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken (2004)
Bubshait, K.A., Selen, W.J.: Project characteristics that influence the implementation of project management techniques: a survey. Project Management JournalĀ 23, 43ā47 (1992)
Project Management Institute: A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Project Management Institute, Newton Square (2004)
Office of Government Commerce: Managing successful projects with PRINCE2 The Stationery Office, London (2005)
Andersen, E.S.: Towards a project management theory for renewal projects. Project Management JournalĀ 37, 15ā30 (2006)
Pinto, J.K., Cleland, D.I., Slevin, D.P.: The frontiers of project management research Project Management Institute (2002)
Clarke, T.E.: Unique features of an R&D work environment and research scientists and engineers. Knowledge, Technology & PolicyĀ 15, 58ā69 (2002)
Brown, C.J.: Can research be project managed? South African Journal of Business Management 30, 72ā77 (1999)
Payne, J.H., Turner, J.R.: Company-wide project management: The planning and control of programmes of projects of different types. International Journal of Project ManagementĀ 16, 55ā59 (1999)
Shenhar, A.J.: Contingent management in temporary, dynamic organizations: The comparative analysis of projects. Journal of High Technology Management ResearchĀ 12, 239ā271 (2001)
Besner, C., Hobbs, B.: Project management practice, generic or contextual: A reality check. Project Management JournalĀ 39, 16ā33 (2008)
vom Brocke, J., Lippe, S.: Towards Management Guidelines for Collaborative Research Projects on Information Systems ā Learning from Project Management Contingency Theory. In: VI Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS (itAIS 2009), Costa Smeralda, Italy (2009)
vom Brocke, J., Lippe, S.: Unfolding the nature of public funded research projects in Information Systems. In: ESWIS 2009, Pre-conference workshop of ECIS 2009, Verona, Italy (2009)
Kuechler, W.L., Vaishnavi, V.K.: Theory development in design science research: Anatomy of a research project. In: Third International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Atlanta, pp. 1ā15 (2008)
Turner, J.R., Cochrane, J.R.: Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and /or methods of achieving them. International Journal of Project ManagementĀ 11, 93ā102 (1993)
Creswell, J.W.: Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)
Wieringa, R.: Design science as nested problem solving. In: International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST) Malvern, PA, USA (2009)
Wieringa, R.: Requirements engineering: Frameworks for understanding. Wiley, Chichester (1996)
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information SystemsĀ 24, 45ā77 (2008)
Crawford, L., Hobbs, B., Turner, J.R.: Aligning capability with strategy: Categorizing projects to do the right projects and to do them right. Project Management JournalĀ 27, 38ā50 (2006)
Sauser, B.J., Reilly, R.R., Shenhar, A.J.: Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights - A comparative analysis of NASAās Mars Climate Orbiter loss. International Journal of Project Management (2009) (accepted January 15, 2009)
Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D.: Reinventing project management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Haward Business, Boston (2007)
Crawford, L., Pollak, J.: Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis. International Journal of Project ManagementĀ 22, 645ā653 (2004)
Jordan, G.B., Hage, J., Mote, J., Hepler, B.: Investigating differences among research projects and implications for managers. R&D ManagementĀ 35, 501ā511 (2005)
Frank, U.: Towards a pluralistic conception of research methods in Information Systems. ICB Research Report, vol.Ā 7. Duisburg-Essen (2006)
Vaishnavi, V.K., Kuechler, W.L.: Design research in Information Systems (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
vom Brocke, J., Lippe, S. (2010). Taking a Project Management Perspective on Design Science Research. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds) Global Perspectives on Design Science Research. DESRIST 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6105. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13334-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13335-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)