Abstract
This paper addresses how the peer review system (FD Commons on WEB) was used as an analytical tool to identify key principles and criteria for assessing teaching and learning in higher education. The focus of this study was to understand various reviewers’ viewpoints of educational events during “lesson study” by examining type of knowledge shared by reviewers. We present the overview of our Peer Review Process Project and report on five pilot studies conducted during spring term 2009. The successive trials revealed the following three points: (1) the lecture summary content differed between reviewers depending on specialty and teaching experience, (2) reviewers wrote more comments concerning lecture quality than basic teaching skills, (3) as keywords for self-reflection, lecturers used content information rather than pedagogical points.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Wenger, E.: Community of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Huber, M.T., Hutchings, P.: The Advancement of Leaning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2005)
Shank, M.J.: Teacher storytelling: A means for creating and learning within a collaborative space. Teaching and Teacher Education 22, 711–721 (2006)
Fernandez, C., Yoshida, M.: Lesson Study. In: Cambridge, B.L. (ed.) Campus Progress. Washington DC, AAHE. Lawrence, New Jersey (2004)
Lieberman, A., Miller, L.: Professional development of teachers. In: Alkin, M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of educational research, 6th edn., vol. 3, pp. 1045–1053. Macmillan, New York (1992)
Cambridge, B.L. (ed.): Campus Progress. AAHE, Washington (2004)
Hatch, T.: A fantasy in teaching and learning: Imaging a future for on-line teaching portfolio. Presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (2000), http://gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/collections/castl_he/thatch/fantasyintchandlearn.pdf (2010.1.16)
Seldin, P.: The Teaching portfolio (3rd). Anker Publishing Company, Boston (2004)
Kahn, S.: Making good work public through electronic teaching portfolio. In: Seldin, P. (ed.) The Teaching portfolio (3rd), pp. 36–50. Anker Publishing Company, Boston (2004)
Boyer, E.: Scholarship Reconsidered, Princeton, NJ (1990)
Fishman, B.J., Davis, E.A.: Teacher learning research and the learning sciences. In: Sawyer, R.K. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 535–550. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)
Kato, Y., Egi, H., Tsukahara, W., Nakagawa, M.: E-Teaching portfolio for ubiquitous peer reviewing to improve the quality of class lectures. In: Proc. of the 33rd Annual Conference of Japanese Society for Information and System in Education, pp. 398–399 (2008)
Houri, S., Terada, T., Kato, Y., Egi, H., Tsukahara, W., Nakagawa, M.: A peer review system on lecture with handwritten annotation, Technical Report of IECE, pp. 17–22 (2008)
Kato, Y., Houri, S., Tsukahara, W., Egi, H., Nakagawa, M.: E-Teaching Portfolio to Enable an Ubiquitous Peer Reviewing Process. In: Proc. of ICALT, pp. 334–336 (2009a)
Kato, Y., Houri, S., Egi, H., Tsukahara, W., Nakagawa, M.: E-Teaching Portfolio to Realize Ubiquitous Peer Reviewing Process in Higher Education. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology 3, 81–91 (2009b)
Hirayama, M.: Lesson Study by Qualitative Method, Kitaoji Shobo, Kyoto (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kato, Y., Ishikawa, M. (2010). Lesson Study Communities on Web to Support Teacher Collaboration for Professional Development. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6094. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13387-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13388-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)