Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Cognitive Tutor for Geometric Proof

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6095))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1660 Accesses

Abstract

Geometric proof has long been a topic of study within Intelligent Tutoring Systems [3,4]. Proof is interesting because it supports a variety of solutions and strategies. However, implementation is challenging and such tutors have not been widely deployed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blessing, S.B., Gilbert, S.G., Oureda, S., Ritter, S.: Authoring model tracing cognitive tutors. International Journal of AI in Education 19 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ritter, S., Blessing, S.B., Wheeler, L.: User modeling and problem-space representation in the tutor runtime engine. In: Brusilovsky, P., Corbett, A.T., de Rosis, F. (eds.) User Modeling 2003, pp. 333–336. Springer, Johnstown (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R.: Effective use of intelligent software in high school math classrooms. In: Proceedings of the 1993 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AACE, Charlottesville (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matsuda, N., VanLehn, K.: Advanced Geometry Tutor: An intelligent tutor that teaches proof-writing with construction. In: Looi, C.-K., McCalla, G., Bredeweg, B., Breuker, J. (eds.) Proceedings of The 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 443–450. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Carnegie Learning, Inc., 437 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219

    Steven Ritter, Brendon Towle, R. Charles Murray, Robert G. M. Hausmann & John Connelly

Authors
  1. Steven Ritter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brendon Towle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Charles Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert G. M. Hausmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John Connelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Human-Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, 15213, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Vincent Aleven  & Jack Mostow  & 

  2. School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, 1 Cleveland Street, 2006, Sydney, Australia

    Judy Kay

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ritter, S., Towle, B., Murray, R.C., Hausmann, R.G.M., Connelly, J. (2010). A Cognitive Tutor for Geometric Proof. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6095. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_110

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_110

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13436-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13437-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics