Skip to main content

Phantom Dose Levels Found at Annual Physics Surveys in a National Mammography Screening Program: Comparison of Doses from Analog and Digital Equipment and from Digital Equipment at Different Points in Time

  • Conference paper
  • 1441 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6136))

Abstract

In a national breast screening program using analog mammography systems, the dose to a 45 mm phantom was routinely calculated at annual physics surveys. This test procedure was retained through the gradual transition to digital mammography. Here the phantom doses recorded for 50 analog mammography systems, and 24 (2007) and 35 (2008/2009) digital systems are compared. The phantom doses for the digital systems were found to be statistically significantly lower than the doses for the analog systems. The digital doses were essentially unchanged from 2007 to 2008/2009.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van Engen, R., Young, K., Bosmans, H.: European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening: Digital mammography. In: Perry, N., Broeders, M., de Wolf, C., Törnberg, S., Holland, R., von Karsa, L. (eds.) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn., Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 105–150 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dance, D.R., Skinner, C.L., Young, K.C., Beckett, J.R., Kotre, C.J.: Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 3225–3240 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dance, D.R., Young, K.C., van Engen, R.: Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the Unite Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 4361–4372 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hendrick, R.E., Pisano, E.D., Averbuk, h.A., Moran, C., Berns, E.A., Yaffe, M.J., Herman, B., Acharyya, S., Gatsonis, C.: Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial. Am. J. Roentgenol. 194(2), 362–369 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pedersen, K., Landmark, I.D., Bredholt, K., Hauge, I.H.R., Olerud, H.M. (2010). Phantom Dose Levels Found at Annual Physics Surveys in a National Mammography Screening Program: Comparison of Doses from Analog and Digital Equipment and from Digital Equipment at Different Points in Time. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13665-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13666-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics