Skip to main content

Contrast Detail Curves on Digital Mammography: Performance Comparison of Raw and Filtered Images

  • Conference paper
Book cover Digital Mammography (IWDM 2010)

Abstract

Detection of low contrast and very small size objects is of great importance on digital mammography imaging techniques. Hence, when comparing image quality performance for different equipments, it would be desirable to make an objective evaluation primarily based on raw images. In this work we present the results of an image quality performance comparison test for digital mammography systems. Contrast detail curves obtained for raw and filtered images from a CDMAM v3.4 phantom were analyzed. The test resulted in an overall image quality figure index for filtered and raw images of 106.66 and 109.90 respectively for a detection rate threshold of 75%. The largest differences were observed with the small diameter dishes of the phantom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CCE (Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas): European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 4th edn. European Communities (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mayo, P., Pascual, A., Rodenas, F., Verdú, G., Campayo, J.M., Villaescusa, J.L.: Desarrollo de Procedimientos de Control de Calidad de Equipos de Radiodiagnóstico Digitales. In: XV Congreso Nacional de Física Médica, Pamplona (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chevalier, M., Morán, P., Morant, J.J., Miquélez, S., Torres, R.: Protocolo Español de Control de Calidad en Mamografía Digital. Sociedad Española de Física Médica. Edicomplet, Madrid (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Torres, R., Agulla, M., Hernando, I.: Relación Entre Dosis y Calidad de Imagen en Dos Sistemas de Mamografía Digital de Silicio. In: XVII Congreso Nacional de Física Médica, Alicante (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ayala, R., Linares, R., García, R.: MIQuaEla, Servicio de Radiofísica y Radioprotección. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (Madrid), www.ucm.es/info/fismed/Digital_Imaging/MIQuaEla.rar

  6. Rasband, W.: ImageJ, National Institutes of Health (Maryland), rsbweb.nih.gov/ij

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Collado-Chamorro, P., Sanz-Freire, C., Gómez-Amez, J., Vázquez-Galiñanes, A., Lopo-Casqueiro, N., González-De La Puente, M. (2010). Contrast Detail Curves on Digital Mammography: Performance Comparison of Raw and Filtered Images. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13665-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13666-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics