Skip to main content

Effect of BI-RADS Assessment in Improving CAD of Masses

  • Conference paper
  • 1437 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6136))

Abstract

In this work we study how the BI-RADS assessment could help to improve the performance of a CAD (Computer Aided Diagnosis) image-based system in the task of masses diagnosis. Our system is based on the use of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) as feature extractor from mammographic images, and Neural Networks as a final classifier. For our tests, the “Digital Database for Screening Mammography” (DDSM) has been used, particularly the subset BCRP_MASS1. The best results were obtained when we used the image data (with feature extraction by means of ICA) together with the BI-RADS assessment provided by DDSM database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CRUK. Breast cancer factsheet. Technical report, Cancer Research UK, London (December 2009), http://www.cancerresearchuk.org

  2. http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/

  3. Haffty, B.G., Kornguth, P., Fisher, D., Beinfield, M., McKhann, C.: Mammographically detected breast cancer: Results with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer 67, 2801–2804 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung, B., Cady, M.: Mammographic screening: No longer controversial. American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials 28(1), 1–4 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wallis, R.G., Moss, M.G., Blanks, S.M.: A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography. Journal of Medical Screening 5(4), 195–201 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sampat, M.P., Markey, M.K., Bovik, A.C.: Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis in Mammography. In: Handbook of Image and Video Processing, 2nd edn., pp. 1195–1217. Academic Press, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rangayyan, R.M., Ayres, F.J., Leo Desautels, J.E.: A review of computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: Toward the detection of subtle signs. Journal of the Franklin Institute 344(3-4), 312–348 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Elter, M., Horsch, A.: Cadx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: A review. Medical Physics 36(6), 2052–2068 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nishikawa, R.M.: Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 31(4-5), 224–235 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Domínguez, A.R., Nandi, A.K.: Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 32(4), 304–315 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freixenet, J., Oliver, A., Martí, R., Lladó, X., Pont, J., Pérez, E., Denton, E.R.E., Zwiggelaar, R.: Eigendetection of masses considering false positive reduction and breast density information. Medical Physics 35(5), 1840–1853 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., Oja, E.: Independent Component Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Suckling, J., et al.: The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. In: Exerpta Medica. International Congress Series, vol. 1069, pp. 375–378 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heath, M., Bowyer, K.W., Kopans, D.B.: Current status of the digital database for screening mammography. In: Digital Mammography. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. American Collage of Radiology. BI-RADS – Breast Imaging Atlas – Mammography, 4th edn. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hyvärinen, A., Oja, E.: Independent components analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Networks 13, 411–430 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sing, T., Sander, O., Beerenwinkel, N., Lengauer, T.: Rocr: visualizing classifier performance in r. Bioinformatics 21(20), 3940–3941 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

García-Manso, A., García-Orellana, C.J., Gallardo-Caballero, R., González-Velasco, H., Macías-Macías, M. (2010). Effect of BI-RADS Assessment in Improving CAD of Masses. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_83

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_83

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13665-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13666-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics