Skip to main content

Investigation of Practical Scoring Methods for Breast Density

  • Conference paper
Digital Mammography (IWDM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6136))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Breast density is known as a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Clinically, physicians often use the BI-RADS or the Boyd categories to describe the density of breast, measured by observing mammograms. More accurately, breast density is measured by the percentage of glandular tissue in a breast. For all these methods, there might be more easily interpretable clinical value if the breast density was reported with scoring methods which are correlated to the patient distribution. In this paper two practical scoring methods will be discussed. The first one is population-based, with each segment of the continuous scores matching the patient BI-RADS distribution found in large scale clinical study. The second one is statistics-based, with the breast density result compared with the mean and the standard deviation from a reference population. Both methods will be described in details, together with preliminary results from an evaluation study with a total of 942 patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. McCormack, V.A., dos Santos Silva, I.: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 15, 1159–1169 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hartman, K., et al.: Volumetric Assessment of Breast Tissue Composition from FFDM images. In: Krupinski, E.A. (ed.) IWDM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5116, pp. 33–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Pisano, E.D., et al.: Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening. NEJM 353, 1773–1783 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole, T.J.: The LMS method for constructing normalized growth standards. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 44, 45–60 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yaffe, M.J., et al.: The Myth of the 50-50 breast. Med. Phys. 36, 5437–5443 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ren, B., Smith, A.P., Marshall, J. (2010). Investigation of Practical Scoring Methods for Breast Density. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_88

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_88

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13665-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13666-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics