Skip to main content

On the Relationship between Logical Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Logic Programming Based on the Distribution Semantics

  • Conference paper
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5989))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A significant part of current research on (inductive) logic programming deals with probabilistic logical models. Over the last decade many logics or languages for representing such models have been introduced. There is currently a great need for insight into the relationships between all these languages. One kind of languages are those that extend probabilistic models with elements of logic, such as the language of Logical Bayesian Networks (LBNs). Some other languages follow the converse strategy of extending logic programs with a probabilistic semantics, often in a way similar to that of Sato’s distribution semantics.

In this paper we study the relationship between the language of LBNs and languages based on the distribution semantics. Concretely, we define a mapping from LBNs to theories in the Independent Choice Logic (ICL). We also show how this mapping can be used to learn ICL theories from data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carbonetto, P., Kisynski, J., Chiang, M., Poole, D.: Learning a contingently acyclic, probabilistic relational model of a social network. Technical Report TR-2009-08, Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Raedt, L., Demoen, B., Fierens, D., Gutmann, B., Janssens, G., Kimmig, A., Landwehr, N., Mantadelis, T., Meert, W., Rocha, R., Santos Costa, V., Thon, I., Vennekens, J.: Towards digesting the alphabet-soup of statistical relational learning. In: NIPS Workshop on Probabilistic Programming (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Raedt, L., Frasconi, P., Kersting, K., Muggleton, S.H. (eds.): Probabilistic Inductive Logic Programming. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4911, pp. 1–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fierens, D.: Logical Bayesian networks. Chapter 3 of Learning Directed Probabilistic Logical Models from Relational Data. PhD Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (2008), http://hdl.handle.net/1979/1833

  5. Fierens, D., Ramon, J., Bruynooghe, M., Blockeel, H.: Learning directed probabilistic logical models: Ordering-search versus structure-search. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 54(1-3), 99–133 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fierens, D.: Mapping logical Bayesian networks to probabilistic logic programs with distribution semantics. Technical Report CW 563, Department of Computer Science, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (2009), http://www.cs.kuleuven.be/publicaties/rapporten/cw/CW563.abs.html

  7. Friedman, N., Goldszmidt, M.: Learning Bayesian networks with local structure. In: Learning and Inference in Graphical Models, pp. 421–459. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Getoor, L., Taskar, B.: An Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gutmann, B., Kimmig, A., Kersting, K., De Raedt, L.: Parameter learning in probabilistic databases: A least squares approach. In: Daelemans, W., Goethals, B., Morik, K. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2008, Part I. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5211, pp. 473–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Meert, W., Struyf, J., Blockeel, H.: Learning ground CP-logic theories by leveraging Bayesian network learning techniques. Fundamenta Informaticae 89(1), 131–160 (2008)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Pelov, N., Denecker, M., Bruynooghe, M.: Well-founded and stable semantics of logic programs with aggregates. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 7(3), 301–353 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Poole, D.: Abducing through negation as failure: Stable models within the independent choice logic. Journal of Logic Programming 44(1-3), 5–35 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Sato, T.: A statistical learning method for logic programs with distribution semantics. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 715–729. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vennekens, J., Verbaeten, S., Bruynooghe, M.: Logic programs with annotated disjunctions. In: Demoen, B., Lifschitz, V. (eds.) ICLP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3132, pp. 431–445. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fierens, D. (2010). On the Relationship between Logical Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Logic Programming Based on the Distribution Semantics. In: De Raedt, L. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5989. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13840-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13840-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13839-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13840-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics