Abstract
Teleoperated assistive robots with compliant arms may be well-suited to tasks that require contact with people and operation within human environments. However, little is known about the effects of force feedback and compliance on task performance. In this paper, we present a pilot study that we conducted to investigate the effects of force feedback and arm compliance on the performance of a simulated hygiene task. In this study, each subject (n=12) teleoperated a compliant arm to clean dry-erase marks off a mannequin with or without force feedback, and with lower or higher stiffness settings for the robot’s arm. Under all four conditions, subjects successfully removed the dry-erase marks, but trials performed with stiffer settings were completed significantly faster. The presence of force feedback significantly reduced the mean contact force, although the trials took significantly longer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zinn, M., Khatib, O., Roth, B., Salisbury, J.: Playing it safe [human-friendly robots]. IEEE Robo. and Auto. Mag. 11(2), 12–21 (2004)
Haddadin, S., et al.: The role of the robot mass and velocity in physical human-robot interaction - part ii: Constrained blunt impacts. In: ICRA, pp. 1339–1345 (2008)
Pratt, G., Williamson, M.: Series elastic actuators. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 1, pp. 399–406 (1995)
Shin, D., Khatib, O., Cutkosky, M.: Design methodologies of a hybrid actuation approach for a human-friendly robot. In: ICRA, pp. 4369–4374 (2009)
Schiavi, R., et al.: Vsa-ii: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans. In: ICRA, pp. 2171–2176 (2008)
Jain, A., Kemp, C.C.: Pulling Open Novel Doors and Drawers with Equilibrium Point Control. In: Proc. IEEE-RAS Int. Conf. Hum. Robo. (2009)
King, C.H., et al.: Tactile feedback induces reduced grasping force in robot-assisted surgery. IEEE T. Haptics 2, 103–110 (2009)
Tholey, G., Desai, J.P., Castellanos, A.E.: Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery. Annals of Surgery 241(1), 102–109 (2005)
Wagner, C., Stylopoulos, N., Howe, R.: The role of force feedback in surgery: analysis of blunt dissection. In: Haptics Symp., pp. 68–74 (2002)
Gwilliam, J.C., et al.: Effects of haptic and graphical force feedback on teleoperated palpation. In: ICRA, pp. 677–682 (2009)
Tavakoli, M., Howe, R.D.: Haptic Effects of Surgical Teleoperator Flexibility. Int. J. Robot. Res. (2009) 0278364909101231
Wyrobek, K., et al.: Towards a personal robotics development platform: Rationale and design of an intrinsically safe personal robot. In: ICRA, pp. 2165–2170 (2008)
Kremer, P., et al.: Multimodal telepresent control of dlr’s rollin’ justin. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robo. Auto., pp. 1601–1602 (2009)
Hammel, J., et al.: Clinical evaluation of a desktop robotic assistant. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 26(3), 1–16 (1989)
Romilly, D., et al.: A functional task analysis and motion sim. for the development of a powered upper-limb orthosis. IEEE T. Rehab. Eng. 2(3), 119–129 (1994)
Topping, M.: The development of handy 1. a robotic system to assist the severely disabled. In: Int. Conf. Rehab. Robo., pp. 244–249 (1999)
Friedman, J., Flash, T.: Task-Dependent Selection of Grasp Kinematics and Stiffness in Human Object Manipulation. Cortex 43, 444–460 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
King, CH., Killpack, M.D., Kemp, C.C. (2010). Effects of Force Feedback and Arm Compliance on Teleoperation for a Hygiene Task. In: Kappers, A.M.L., van Erp, J.B.F., Bergmann Tiest, W.M., van der Helm, F.C.T. (eds) Haptics: Generating and Perceiving Tangible Sensations. EuroHaptics 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6191. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14064-8_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14064-8_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14063-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14064-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)