Abstract
In this paper we present an alternative interpretation of statements of epistemic possibility, which does not induce a consistency test on a common ground, as in , but which tests whether the possibility is supported by some update of the common ground, as in . The information space relative to which such claims are evaluated are taken to consist in the possible developements of a discourse in action. It is shown that this notion of Might not only behaves better logically and pragmatically speaking, but that it also allows for non-trivial attitude reports and questions about epistemic possibilities. These epistemic modal statements can also be understood to guide or focus the inquisitive actions of the discourse participants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brumwell, C.: A Dynamic Analysis of Epistemic Possibility. Master’s thesis, ILLC, Universiteit van Amsterdam (2009)
Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Might and Free Choice in Inquisitive Semantics. In: Proceedings of SALT 18, Ohio State University, Ohio (2009)
Dekker, P.: Contexts for Questions. In: Hunyadi, L., Rákosi, G., Tóth, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium of Logic and Language, pp. 47–58. University of Debrecen, Debrecen (2004)
Dekker, P.: Optimal Inquisitive Discourse. In: Aloni, M., Butler, A., Dekker, P. (eds.) Questions in Dynamic Semantics, CRiSPI 17, pp. 83–101. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)
Gillies, A., von Fintel, K.: CIA Leaks. The Philosophical Review 117, 77–98 (2008)
Ginzburg, J.: Resolving Questions, I & II. Linguistics and Philosophy 18(5,6), 459–527, 567–609 (1995)
Groenendijk, J.: The Logic of Interrogation. In: Aloni, M., Butler, A., Dekker, P. (eds.) Questions in Dynamic Semantics. CRiSPI 17, pp. 43–62. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)
Hulstijn, J.: Structured Information States. Raising and Resolving Issues. In: Benz, A., Jäger, G. (eds.) Proceedings of MunDial 1997, pp. 99–117. University of Munich (1997)
Kratzer, A.: What Must and Can Must and Can Mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1977)
Landman, F.: Towards a Theory of Information. Foris, Dordrecht (1986)
Roberts, C.: Information structure in discourse. In: Yoon, J.H., Kathol, A. (eds.) Working Papers in Linguistics 49, pp. 91–136. Ohio State University (1996)
van Rooy, R.: Questioning to resolve decision problems. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 727–763 (2003)
Roussarie, L.: What might be known: epistemic modality and uncertain contexts. In: Journées Sémantique and Modélisation (JSM 2009), Paris (2009)
Stalnaker, R.: Assertion. In: Cole, P. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 9 – Pragmatics, pp. 315–332. Academic Press, New York (1978)
Veltman, F.: Data Semantics. In: Groenendijk, J., Janssen, T., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Truth, Interpretation and Information, pp. 43–63. Foris, Dordrecht (1984)
Veltman, F.: Defaults in Update Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25(3), 221–261 (1996)
Yalcin, S.: Modality and Inquiry. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dekker, P.J.E. (2010). There Is Something about Might . In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6042. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14286-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14287-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)