Abstract
This paper summarizes the essence of a recent game theoretic explanation of free choice readings of disjunctions under existential modals ([8]). It introduces principles of game model construction to represent the context of utterance, and it spells out the basic mechanism of iterated best response reasoning in signaling games.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asher, N., Bonevac, D.: Free choice permission as strong permission. Synthese 145(3), 303–323 (2005)
Benz, A., van Rooij, R.: Optimal assertions and what they implicate. Topoi 26, 63–78 (2007)
Camerer, C.F.: Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2003)
Camerer, C.F., Ho, T.-H., Chong, J.-K.: A cognitive hierarchy model of games. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(3), 861–898 (2004)
Chierchia, G.: Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In: Belletti, A. (ed.) Structures and Beyond, pp. 39–103. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)
Crawford, V.P.: Lying for strategic advantage: Rational and boundedly rational misrepresentation of intentions. American Economic Review 93(1), 133–149 (2003)
Fox, D.: Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In: Sauerland, U., Stateva, P. (eds.) Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, pp. 71–120. Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire (2007)
Franke, M.: Signal to Act: Game Theory in Pragmatics. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam (2009)
Grice, P.H.: Studies in the Ways of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)
Jäger, G.: Game dynamics connects semantics and pragmatics. In: Pietarinen, A.-V. (ed.) Game Theory and Linguistic Meaning, pp. 89–102. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)
Jäger, G., Ebert, C.: Pragmatic rationalizability. In: Riester, A., Solstad, T. (eds.) Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 13, pp. 1–15 (2009)
Kamp, H.: Free choice permission. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74, 57–74 (1973)
Kamp, H.: Semantics versus pragmatics. In: Guenthner, F., Schmidt, S.J. (eds.) Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages, pp. 255–287. Reidel, Dordrecht (1978)
Kratzer, A., Shimoyama, J.: Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In: Otsu, Y. (ed.) Proceeding of the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, pp. 1–25 (2002)
Mühlenbernd, R.: Kommunikationsmodell für den Entwicklungsprozess von Implikaturen. Master’s thesis, University of Bielefeld (2009)
Schulz, K.: A pragmatic solution for the paradox of free choice permission. Synthese 147, 343–377 (2005)
Stalnaker, R.: Saying and meaning, cheap talk and credibility. In: Benz, A., Jäger, G., van Rooij, R. (eds.) Game Theory and Pragmatics, pp. 83–100. Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire (2006)
Zimmermann, T.E.: Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Natural Language Semantics 8, 255–290 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Franke, M. (2010). Free Choice from Iterated Best Response. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6042. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14286-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14287-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)