Skip to main content

The Semantics of Count Nouns

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language and Meaning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6042))

Abstract

We offer an account of the semantics of count nouns based on the observation that for some count nouns, the set of atoms in the denotation of the singular predicate is contextually determined. The denotation of singular count nouns is derived relative to a context k, where k is a set of entities which count as atoms in a particular context. An operation COUNTk applies to the mass noun denotation and derives the count meaning: a set of ordered pairs <d,k> where d is a member of N ∩ k and k is the context relative to which d counts as one. Count nouns and mass nouns are thus typally distinct and the grammatical differences between them follow from this. We distinguish between naturally atomic predicates, which denote sets of inherently individuable entities or Boolean algebras generated from such sets, and semantically atomic predicates, which denote sets which are atomic relative to a particular context k. This distinction is orthogonal to the mass count distinction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chierchia, G.: Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of Semantic Parameter. In: Rothstein, S. (ed.) Events and grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chierchia, G.: Mass Nouns, Vagueness and Semantic Variation. Synthese (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gillon, B.: Toward a Common semantics for English Count and Mass Nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 597–640 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barner, D., Snedeker, J.: Quantity Judgments and Individuation: Evidence that Mass Nouns Count. Cognition 97, 41–66 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothstein, S.: Counting and the Mass Count Distinction. to appear in Journal of Semantics

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schwarzschild, R.: Stubborn Distributivity, Multiparticipant Nouns and The Count/Mass Distinction. In: Proceedings of NELS 39 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pires de Oliveira, R., Rothstein, S.: Bare Singular is Really Mass in Brazilian Portuguese. Ms Universida de Federal de Santa Catarina and Bar-Ilan University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krifka, M.: Thematic Relations as Links Between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution. In: Sag, I., Szabolsci, A. (eds.) Lexical matters, CSLI, Stanford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mittwoch, A.: Aspects of English Aspect: On The Interaction of Perfect, Progressive and Durational Phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 203–254 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rothstein, S.: Structuring Events. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Link, G.: The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach. In: Baüerle, R., Schwarze, C., von Stechow, A. (eds.) Meaning, Use and Interpretation, pp. 303–323. de Gruyter, Berlin (1983); Reprinted in Portner, P., Partee, B. (eds.): Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings. Blackwell, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Landman, F.: Groups II. Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 723–745 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krifka, M.: Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics. In: Bartsch, R., van Bentham, J., van Emde Boas, P. (eds.) Semantics and Contextual Expressions, pp. 75–155. Foris, Dordrecht (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krifka, M.: Common Nouns: A Contrastive Analysis of English and Chinese. In: Carlson, G., Pelletier, F.J. (eds.) The Generic Book. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rothstein, S.: Individuating and Measure Readings of Classifier Constructions: Evidence From Modern Hebrew. In: Brill Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics (BAALL), vol. 1, pp. 106–145 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rothstein, S. (2010). The Semantics of Count Nouns. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6042. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14286-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14287-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics