Abstract
This paper examines the semantics of much when it occurs as a dummy element, in so-called much support (Fred is diligent; in fact he is too much so) and more comparatives (more intelligent, where more = much + -er). It is shown that far from being anomalies, much support and more comparatives provide a clue to the correct analysis of much more generally: much is essentially contentless, serving only as a carrier of degree morphology. In short, much always acts as much support. These findings provide support for a theory of quantity adjectives (many, few, much and little) as predicates of scalar intervals, with the remainder of the content traditionally ascribed to them contributed instead by null syntactic elements and operations. The vacuous nature of much itself is also argued to account for its infelicity in unmodified form in many contexts (e.g. ??We bought much rice).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barwise, J., Cooper, R.: Generalized quantifiers and natural languages. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219 (1981)
Bresnan, J.: Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 275–343 (1973)
Corver, N.: Much support as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 119–164 (1997)
Cresswell, M.J.: The semantics of degree. In: Partee, B. (ed.) Montague grammar, pp. 261–292. Academic Press, New York (1977)
Doetjes, J.S.: Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Leiden (1997)
Hackl, M.: Comparative quantifiers. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2000)
Heim, I.: Degree operators and scope. In: Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) X. CLC Publications, Ithaca (2000)
Heim, I.: Little. In: Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XVI. CLC Publications, Ithaca (2006)
Kayne, R.S.: On the syntax of quantity in English. In: Kayne, R.S. (ed.) Movement and silence. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)
Kennedy, C., McNally, L.: The syntax and semantics of multiple degree modification in English. In: Proceedings of the HPSG 2005 Conference. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2005)
Klein, E.: The interpretation of adjectival comparatives. Journal of Linguistics 18, 113–136 (1982)
Landman, F.: Indefinites and the type of sets. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)
Partee, B.H.: Many quantifiers. In: Powers, J., de Jong, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, pp. 383–402. Ohio State University, Columbus (1989)
Rett, J.: How many maximizes in the Balkan Sprachbund. In: Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XVI. CLC Publications, Ithaca (2006)
Schwarzschild, R.: The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax 9, 67–110 (2006)
Solt, S.: The semantics of adjectives of quantity. Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York (2009)
von Stechow, A.: Times as degrees: früh(er) ‘early(er)’, spät(er) ‘late(r)’, and phrase adverbs. Tübingen (2006) (Unpublished manuscript)
Zwicky, A.: Much ado about a lot. Language Log, April 5 (2006a)
Zwicky, A.: Big much squib. Language Log, May 17 (2006b)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Solt, S. (2010). Much Support and More . In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6042. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_45
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14286-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14287-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)