Abstract
It seems a fact that movement dependencies come in two flavours: ”A” and ”A-bar”. Over the years, a number of apparently independent properties have been shown to cluster together around this distinction. However, the basic structural property relating these two kinds of movement, the ban on improper movement (’once you go bar, you never go back’), has never been given a satisfactory explanation. Here, I propose a timing-based account of the A/A-bar distinction, which derives the ban on improper movement, and allows for a simple and elegant account of some of their differences. In this account, ”A” dependencies are those which are entered into before an expression is first merged into a structure, and ”A-bar” dependencies are those an expression enters into after having been merged. The resulting system is mildly context-sensitive, providing therefore a restrictive account of possible human grammars, while remaining expressive enough to be able to describe the kinds of dependencies which are thought to be manifest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amblard, M.: Calculs de représentations sémantiques et syntaxe générative: les grammaires minimalistes catégorielles. Ph.D. thesis, Université Bordeaux I (2007)
Bhatt, R.: The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification. Natural Language Semantics 10(1), 43–90 (2002)
Bianchi, V.: The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry 31(1), 123–140 (2000)
Boeckx, C.A.: A note on contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2), 357–366 (2000)
Bresnan, J.: Lexical-Functional Syntax. Blackwell, Oxford (2001)
Büring, D.: Crossover situations. Natural Language Semantics 12(1), 23–62 (2004)
Chomsky, N.: On Wh-movement. In: Culicover, P.W., Wasow, T., Akmajian, A. (eds.) Formal Syntax, pp. 71–132. Academic Press, New York (1977)
Chomsky, N.: Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht (1981)
Chomsky, N.: The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
Collins, C.: A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2), 81–120 (2005)
Fox, D.: Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30(2), 157–196 (1999)
Gärtner, H.M., Michaelis, J.: A note on the complexity of constraint interaction: Locality conditions and minimalist grammars. In: Blache, P., Stabler, E.P., Busquets, J.V., Moot, R. (eds.) LACL 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3492, pp. 114–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Gazdar, G.: Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry 12(2), 155–184 (1981)
Kayne, R.: The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
Kobele, G.M.: Generating Copies: An investigation into structural identity in language and grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (2006)
Lasnik, H.: Chains of arguments. In: Epstein, S.D., Hornstein, N. (eds.) Working Minimalism in Current Studies in Linguistics, vol. 32, pp. 189–215. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)
Lasnik, H., Stowell, T.: Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 687–720 (1991)
Mahajan, A.: The A/A-bar Distinction and Movement Theory. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1990)
Michaelis, J.: On Formal Properties of Minimalist Grammars. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Potsdam (2001)
Michaelis, J.: Notes on the complexity of complex heads in a minimalist grammar. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Frameworks (TAG+6), Venezia (2002)
Müller, G., Sternefeld, W.: Improper movement and unambiguous binding. Linguistic Inquiry 24(3), 461–507 (1993)
Pollard, C.J., Sag, I.A.: Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)
Postal, P.M.: Cross-over phenomena. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1971)
Reinhart, T.: Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1983)
Ross, J.R.: Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1967), published in 1986, as Infinite Syntax, Ablex
Ruys, E.G.: Weak crossover as a scope phenomenon. Linguistic Inquiry 31(3), 513–539 (2000)
Sportiche, D.: Reconstruction, binding and scope, ms. UCLA (2005)
Stabler, E.P.: Derivational minimalism. In: Retoré, C. (ed.) LACL 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1328, pp. 68–95. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Stabler, E.P., Keenan, E.L.: Structural similarity within and among languages. Theoretical Computer Science 293, 345–363 (2003)
de Vries, M.: The Syntax of Relativization. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kobele, G.M. (2010). A Formal Foundation for A and A-bar Movement. In: Ebert, C., Jäger, G., Michaelis, J. (eds) The Mathematics of Language. MOL MOL 2009 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14321-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14322-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)