Skip to main content

Without Remnant Movement, MGs Are Context-Free

  • Conference paper
The Mathematics of Language (MOL 2009, MOL 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6149))

Abstract

Minimalist grammars offer a formal perspective on a popular linguistic theory, and are comparable in weak generative capacity to other mildly context sensitive formalism. Minimalist grammars allow for the straightforward definition of so-called remnant movement constructions, which have found use in many linguistic analyses. It has been conjectured that the ability to generate this kind of configuration is crucial to the super-context-free expressivity of minimalist grammars. This conjecture is here proven.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chomsky, N.: Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chomsky, N.: The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, C.: A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2), 81–120 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Comon, H., Dauchet, M., Gilleron, R., Jacquemard, F., Lugiez, D., Tison, S., Tommasi, M.: Tree automata techniques and applications (2002), http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.fr/tata

  5. Culy, C.: The complexity of the vocabulary of Bambara. Linguistics and Philosophy 8(3), 345–352 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiengo, R.: On trace theory. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1), 35–61 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gärtner, H.M., Michaelis, J.: Some remarks on locality conditions and minimalist grammars. In: Sauerland, U., Gärtner, H.M. (eds.) Interfaces + Recursion = Language?, Studies in Generative Grammar, vol. 89, pp. 161–195. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., Sag, I.: Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haider, H.: V-clustering and clause union - causes and effects. In: Seuren, P., Kempen, G. (eds.) Verb Constructions in German and Dutch, pp. 91–126. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harkema, H.: Parsing Minimalist Languages. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kobele, G.M.: Generating Copies: An investigation into structural identity in language and grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kobele, G.M.: A formal foundation for A and A-bar movement in the minimalist program. In: Kracht, M., Penn, G., Stabler, E.P. (eds.) Mathematics of Language, vol. 10. UCLA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kobele, G.M., Retoré, C., Salvati, S.: An automata theoretic approach to minimalism. In: Rogers, J., Kepser, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop Model-Theoretic Syntax at 10; ESSLLI 2007, Dublin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koopman, H., Szabolcsi, A.: Verbal Complexes. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Michaelis, J.: On Formal Properties of Minimalist Grammars. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Potsdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michaelis, J.: Notes on the complexity of complex heads in a minimalist grammar. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Frameworks (TAG+6), Venezia (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michaelis, J., Kracht, M.: Semilinearity as a syntactic invariant. In: Retoré, C. (ed.) LACL 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1328, pp. 37–40. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers, J.: A Descriptive Approach to Language-Theoretic Complexity. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Shieber, S.M.: Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 333–343 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stabler, E.P.: Derivational minimalism. In: Retoré, C. (ed.) LACL 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1328, pp. 68–95. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Stabler, E.P.: Remnant movement and complexity. In: Bouma, G., Hinrichs, E., Kruijff, G.J.M., Oehrle, R. (eds.) Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Semantics, ch. 16, pp. 299–326. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stabler, E.P., Keenan, E.L.: Structural similarity within and among languages. Theoretical Computer Science 293, 345–363 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kobele, G.M. (2010). Without Remnant Movement, MGs Are Context-Free. In: Ebert, C., Jäger, G., Michaelis, J. (eds) The Mathematics of Language. MOL MOL 2009 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14321-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14322-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics