Skip to main content

Randomized Approaches for Nearest Neighbor Search in Metric Space When Computing the Pairwise Distance Is Extremely Expensive

  • Conference paper
  • 681 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6124))

Abstract

Finding the closest object for a query in a database is a classical problem in computer science. For some modern biological applications, computing the similarity between two objects might be very time consuming. For example, it takes a long time to compute the edit distance between two whole chromosomes and the alignment cost of two 3D protein structures. In this paper, we study the nearest neighbor search problem in metric space, where the pair-wise distance between two objects in the database is known and we want to minimize the number of distances computed on-line between the query and objects in the database in order to find the closest object. We have designed two randomized approaches for indexing metric space databases, where objects are purely described by their distances with each other. Analysis and experiments show that our approaches only need to compute O(logn) objects in order to find the closest object, where n is the total number of objects in the database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., Lipman, D.J.: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pearson, W.R., Lipman, D.J.: Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 85(8), 2444–2448 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo, F., Wang, L., Yang, Y.: Efficient Algorithms for 3D Protein Substructure Identification. In: The 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, iCBBE 2010 (accepted 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ciaccia, P., Patella, M., Zezula, P.: M-tree: An Efficient Access Method for Similarity Search in Metric Spaces. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 1997), pp. 426–435 (August 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Navarro, G.: Searching in Metric Spaces by Spatial Approximation. The VLDB Journal 11, 28–46 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marvin, S.: The choice of reference points in best-match file searching. Communnications of the ACM 20, 339–343 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Micó, M.L., Oncina, J., Vidal, E.: A new version of the nearest-neighbour approximating and eliminating search algorithm (AESA) with linear preprocessing time and memory requirements. Pattern Recognition Letters 15, 9–17 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Filho, R.F.S., Traina, A.J.M., Traina Jr., C., Faloutsos, C.: Similarity search without tears: the OMNI-family of all-purpose access methods. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2001), pp. 623–630 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bustos, B., Navarro, G., Chávez, E.: Pivot selection techniques for proximity searching in metric spaces. Pattern Recognition Letters 24, 2357–2366 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Rico-Juan, J.R., Micó, L.: Comparison of AESA and LAESA search algorithms using string and tree-edit-distances. Pattern Recognition Letters 24, 1417–1426 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Digout, C., Nascimento, M.A., Coman, A.: Similarity search and dimensionality reduction: Not all dimensions are equally useful. In: Lee, Y., Li, J., Whang, K.-Y., Lee, D. (eds.) DASFAA 2004. LNCS, vol. 2973, pp. 831–842. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vidal, E.: An algorithm for finding nearest neighbours in (approximately) constant average time. Pattern Recognition Letters 4, 145–157 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zezula, P., Amato, G., Dohnal, V., Batko, M.: Similarity Search: The Metric Space Approach. Advances in Database Systems, vol. 32. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, M., Ma, B., Wang, L.: On the closest string and substring problems. Journal of the ACM 49, 157–171 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, L., Yang, Y., Lin, G. (2010). Randomized Approaches for Nearest Neighbor Search in Metric Space When Computing the Pairwise Distance Is Extremely Expensive. In: Chen, B. (eds) Algorithmic Aspects in Information and Management. AAIM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6124. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14355-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14355-7_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14354-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14355-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics