Skip to main content

Authoring Problem-Solving Tutors: A Comparison between ASTUS and CTAT

  • Chapter
Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 308))

Abstract

ASTUS is an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) framework for problem-solving domains. In this chapter we present a study we performed to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of ASTUS compared to the well-known Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT) framework. To challenge their capacity to handle a comprehensive model of a well-defined task, we built a multi-column subtraction tutor (model and interface) with each framework. We incorporated into the model various pedagogically relevant procedural errors taken from the literature, to see how each framework deals with complex situations where remedial help may be needed. We successfully encoded the model with both frameworks and found situations in which we consider ASTUS to surpass CTAT. Examples of these include: ambiguous steps, errors with multiple (possibly correct) steps, composite errors, and off-path steps. Selected scenarios in the multi-column subtraction domain are presented to illustrate that ASTUS can show a more sophisticated behavior in these situations. ASTUS achieves this by relying on an examinable hierarchical knowledge representation system and a domain-independent MVC-based approach to build the tutors’ interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Sewall, J., Koedinger, K.R.: The Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT): Preliminary Evaluation of Efficiency Gains. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 61–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2006a)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aleven, V., Sewall, J., McLaren, B.M., Koedinger, K.R.: Rapid Authoring of Intelligent Tutors for Real-World and Experimental Use. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Sewall, J., Koedinger, K.R.: A New Paradigm for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Example-Tracing Tutors. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 19, 105–154 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R., Pelletier, R.: A Development System for Model-Tracing Tutors. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, VA, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R.: Rules of the Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(2), 167–207 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R., Lebiere, C.: The Atomic Components of Thought. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., VanLehn, K.: Towards a Generative Theory of “Bugs”. In: Addition and Subtraction: A Cognitive Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge Tracing: Modeling the Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4, 253–278 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M., Lebeau, J.F., Abdessemed, A., Courtemanche, F., Mayers, A.: A Standard Method of Developing User Interfaces for a Generic ITS Framework. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 312–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier-Viger, P., Najjar, M., Mayers, A., Nkambou, R.: A Cognitive and Logic Based Model for Building Glass-Box Learning Objects. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects 2, 77–94 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier-Viger, P., Najjar, M., Mayers, A., Nkambou, R.: From Black-box Learning Objects to Glass-Box Learning Objects. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 258–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, N.T., Koedinger, K.R., Razzaq, L.: Expanding the Model-Tracing Architecture: A 3rd Generation Intelligent Tutor for Algebra Symbolization. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 18(2), 153–178 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K.R., Aleven, V., Heffernan, N.: Toward a Rapid Development Environment for Cognitive Tutors. In: Proceedings of AI-ED, Artificial Intelligence in Education: Shaping the Future of Learning through Intelligent Technologies, pp. 455–457. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K.R., Andreson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., Mark, M.A.: Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8, 30–43 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, N., Cohen, W.W., Koedinger, K.R.: Applying Programming by Demonstration in an Intelligent Authoring Tool for Cognitive Tutors. In: AAAI Workshop on Human Comprehensible Machine Learning, pp. 1–8 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic, A., Koedinger, K.R., Martin, B.: A Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Tutoring and Constraint-Based Modelling. In: Brusilovsky, P., Corbett, A.T., de Rosis, F. (eds.) UM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2702, pp. 313–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T.: An Overview of Intelligent Tutoring System Authoring Tools: Updated Analysis of the State of the Art. In: Murray, T., Blessing, S., Ainsworth, S. (eds.) Authoring Tools for Advanced Learning Environments, pp. 491–544. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, A., Lefebvre, B., Frasson, C.: Miace, a Human Cognitive Architecture. SIGCUE Outlook 27(2), 61–77 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic, A., Suraweera, P., Martin, B., Zakharov, K., Milik, N., Holland, J.: Authoring Constraint-based Tutors in ASPIRE. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Najjar, M., Mayers, A., Fournier-Viger, P.: A Novel Cognitive Computational Knowledge Model for Virtual Learning Environments. The WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education 3(4), 246–255 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Orey, M.A.: Interface Design for High Bandwidth Diagnosis: The Case of POSIT. Educational Technology 30(9), 43–48 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Orey, M.A., Burton, J.K.: POSIT: Process Oriented Subtraction-Interface for Tutoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 1(2), 77–105 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Razzaq, L., Patvarczki, J., Almeida, S.F., Vartak, M., Feng, M., Heffernan, N.T., Koedinger, K.R.: The ASSISTment builder: Supporting the life cycle of ITS content creation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 2(2), 157–166 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L.B.: Syntax and Semantics in Learning to Subtract. In: Moser, J. (ed.) Addition and Subtraction: A Cognitive Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman, D., Kelly, E.A., Martinak, R., Ward, R.D., Moore, J.L.: Studies of Diagnosis and Remediation with High School Algebra Students. Cognitive Science 13, 551–568 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K.: Mind Bugs: The Origin of Procedural Misconceptions. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K.: The Behavior of Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 16(3), 227–265 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J.A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., Wintersgill, M.: The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15(3), 1–47 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E.: Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paquette, L., Lebeau, JF., Mayers, A. (2010). Authoring Problem-Solving Tutors: A Comparison between ASTUS and CTAT. In: Nkambou, R., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 308. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14363-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14363-2_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14362-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14363-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics