Skip to main content

A Spatial Search Framework for Executing Perceptions and Actions in Diagrammatic Reasoning

  • Conference paper
Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6170))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Diagrammatic reasoning (DR) requires perceiving information from a diagram and modifying/creating objects in a diagram according to problem solving needs. The perceptions and actions in most DR systems are hand-coded for the specific application. The absence of a general framework for executing perceptions/actions poses as a major hindrance to using them opportunistically. Our goal is to develop a framework for executing a wide variety of specified perceptions and actions across tasks/domains without human intervention. We observe that the domain/task-specific perceptions/actions can be transformed into domain/task-independent spatial problems. In our framework, a human problem solver specifies a spatial problem as a quantified constraint satisfaction problem (QCSP) in the real domain using an open-ended vocabulary of properties, relations and actions involving three types of spatial objects – points, curves, regions. Traditional approaches solve such QCSPs by computing the equivalent quantifier-free algebraic expression, the complexity of which is inherently doubly exponential. In this paper, we investigate a domain-independent framework of spatial search for solving 2D spatial problems specified as QCSPs. The framework searches for the solution in the space of the diagram instead of in the space of algebraic equations/inequalities. We prove the correctness of our approach and show that it is more efficient than cylindrical algebraic decomposition, a well-known algebraic approach, by executing perceptions/actions in two army applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chandrasekaran, B., Kurup, U., Banerjee, B., Josephson, J.R., Winkler, R.: An architecture for problem solving with diagrams. In: Blackwell, A.F., Marriott, K., Shimojima, A. (eds.) Diagrams 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2980, pp. 151–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Pisan, Y.: A visual routines based model of graph understanding. In: Proc. 17th Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, Pittsburgh (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tessler, S., Iwasaki, Y., Law, K.: Qualitative structural analysis using diagrammatic reasoning. In: Proc. 14th Intl. Joint Conf. AI, Montreal, pp. 885–893 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lindsay, R.K.: Using diagrams to understand geometry. Computational Intelligence 14(2), 238–272 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jamnik, M.: Mathematical Reasoning with Diagrams: From Intuition to Automation. CSLI Press/Stanford University, CA (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferguson, R.W.: Magi: Analogy-based encoding using symmetry and regularity. In: Proc. 16th Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society, Atlanta, GA, pp. 283–288 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Banerjee, B.: Spatial problem solving for diagrammatic reasoning. PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Egenhofer, M.J., Franzosa, R.D.: Point set topological relations. Intl. Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5, 161–174 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frank, A.U.: Qualitative spatial reasoning about distances and directions in geographic space. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 3, 343–371 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohn, A.G., Bennett, B., Gooday, J.M., Gotts, N.: RCC: A calculus for region based qualitative spatial reasoning. GeoInformatica 1, 275–316 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, C.W., Davenport, J.H.: The complexity of quantifier elimination and cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In: Proc. Intl. Symp. Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, pp. 54–60. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Collins, G.E., Hong, H.: Partial cylindrical algebraic decomposition for quantifier elimination. Journal of Symbolic Computation 12(3), 299–328 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Banerjee, B., Chandrasekaran, B. (2010). A Spatial Search Framework for Executing Perceptions and Actions in Diagrammatic Reasoning. In: Goel, A.K., Jamnik, M., Narayanan, N.H. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6170. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14599-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14600-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics