Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5811))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 459 Accesses

Abstract

Current research in multimedia retrieval (MR) does not satisfactorily mirror research results from psychology revealing a different significance of certain characteristics of a media object to a query in terms of similarity. Although the relevance of user-controlled condition weights has been demonstrated, there is a lack of systems supporting users in setting these weights.

In this work, we present a relevance feedback based approach that supports users to set condition weights in order to retrieve results from the MR system that are consistent with their perception of similarity. Condition weights are learned by a machine based learning algorithm from user preferences based on a partially ordered set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Improving Retrieval Performance by Relevance Feedback. Technical report, Ithaca, NY, USA (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Codd, E.F.: A Database Sublanguage Founded on the Relational Calculus. In: SIGFIDET (ed.) ACM SIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control, pp. 35–61 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Date, C.J., Darwen, H.: A Guide to the SQL Standard, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control (8), 338–353 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bruce, V., Green, P.R.: Visual Perception –physiology, psychology and ecology, 2nd edn. reprinted.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hove and London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Selfridge, O.G.: Pandemonium. A paradigm for learning. The mechanics of thought processes (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salton, G., Fox, E.A., Wu, H.: Extended Boolean Information Retrieval. Commun. ACM 26(11), 1022–1036 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, J.H.: Properties of Extended Boolean Models in Information Retrieval. In: SIGIR (ed.) SIGIR 1994: Proceedings of the 17th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 182–190. Springer–Verlag New York, Inc. (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Birkhoff, G., von Neumann, J.: The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Annals of Mathematics 37, 823–843 (1936)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmitt, I.: QQL: A DB&IR Query Language. The VLDB Journal 17(1), 39–56 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmitt, I.: Weighting in CQQL. Technical Report 4, Cottbus (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weikum, G.: DB&IR: both sides now. In: SIGMOD (ed.) SIGMOD 2007: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pp. 25–30. ACM, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Rowe, L.A., Jain, R.: ACM SIGMM retreat report on future directions in multimedia research. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 1(1), 3–13 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowell Workshop: The Lowell Database Research Self Assessment. Technical report (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fagin, R., Wimmers, E.L.: A Formula for Incorporating Weights into Scoring Rules. Special Issue of Theoretical Computer Science (239), 309–338 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Craik, K.J.W.: The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1943)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction design: Beyond human–computer interaction. Wiley, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human–computer interaction, 4th edn. Pearson, Boston (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ciaccia, P., Montesi, D., Penzo, W., Trombetta, A.: Imprecision and User Preferences in Multimedia Queries: A Generic Algebraic Approach. In: Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B. (eds.) FoIKS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1762, pp. 50–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmitt, I., Schulz, N.: Similarity Relational Calculus and its Reduction to a Similarity Algebra. In: Seipel, D., Turull-Torres, J.M.a. (eds.) FoIKS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2942, pp. 252–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nelder, J.A., Mead, R.: A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal 7, 308–313 (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zellhöfer, D., Schmitt, I. (2010). A Poset Based Approach for Condition Weighting. In: Detyniecki, M., Leiner, U., Nürnberger, A. (eds) Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval. Identifying, Summarizing, and Recommending Image and Music. AMR 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5811. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14758-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14758-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14757-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14758-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics