Skip to main content

User-Tailored Document Planning – A Game-Theoretic Approach

  • Conference paper
Advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6233))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1151 Accesses

Abstract

In order to satisfy the informational demands of different users, generated texts should be tailored to the respective user types. Document planning may benefit from a formal modeling of the participating agents (the generation system and the user) within the framework of game theory. We show how rhetorical structures map to speaker strategies, and how a user model may be represented as a domain theory, containing different hypotheses for the listener strategies. Based on this, we present an algorithm which simultaneously performs the tasks of message selection and document structuring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Console, L., Dupre, D., Torasso, P.: On the relationship between abduction and deduction. Journal of Logic and Computation 1(5), 661–690 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Jäger, G.: Evolutionary game theory and typology: a case study. Language 83, 74–109 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klabunde, R.: Towards a game-theoretic approach to document planning. In: Proceedings of ENLG 2009, pp. 102–105 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klabunde, R., Kornrumpf, A.: A game-theoretic approach to document planning for performance data (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis, D.: Convention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text 8(3), 243–281 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pietarinen, A.-V. (ed.): Game Theory and Linguistic Meaning. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Reiter, E., Dale, R.: Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shoham, Y., Leyton-Brown, K.: Multiagent Systems. Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Sripada, S.G., Reiter, E., Hunter, J., Yu, J.: Generating English Summaries of Time Series Data Using the Gricean Maxims. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 198–196 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Klabunde, R., Kornrumpf, A. (2010). User-Tailored Document Planning – A Game-Theoretic Approach. In: Loftsson, H., Rögnvaldsson, E., Helgadóttir, S. (eds) Advances in Natural Language Processing. NLP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6233. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14770-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14770-8_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14769-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14770-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics