Abstract
In phenomena which have been claimed to require “covert movements” in generative terms, a relevant lexical item seems to require a means to somehow refer to the meaning of its surroundings in order for the meaning of the whole sentence to be properly computed. This has motivated generative/transformational grammars to adopt a movement of the relevant item to the position where its scope contains surroundings that influence its meaning, while it remains as an issue to be solved for categorial/Lambek-style grammars, namely, grammars without movements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barker, C.: Introducing Continuations. In: Hastings, R., Jackson, B., Zvolenszky, Z. (eds.) SALT 11, CLC Publications, Ithaca (2001)
Barker, C.: Continuations and the Nature of Quantification. Natural Language Semantics 10(3), 211–241 (2002)
Barker, C.: Continuations in Natural Language. In: H. Thielecke (ed.): the Fourth ACM SIGPLAN Continuations Workshop (CW 2004). Technical Report CSR-04-1, School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT. United Kingdom, pp. 1–11 (2004)
Barker, C., Shan, C.-c.: Types as Graphs: Continuations in Type Logical Grammar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15(4), 331–370 (2006)
Bekki, D.: Monads and Meta-Lambda Calculus. In: Hattori, H. (ed.) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (JSAI 2008 Conference and Workshops, Asahikawa, Japan, Revised Selected Papers), June 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5447, pp. 193–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Danvy, O., Filinski, A.: Abstracting Control. In: LFP 1990, the 1990 ACM Conference on Lisp and Functional Programming, pp. 151–160 (1990)
Danvy, O., Filinski, A.: Representing control. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 2(4) (1992)
de Groote, P.: Type raising, continuations, and classical logic. In: van Rooij, R., Stokhof, M. (eds.) The 13th Amsterdam Colloquium. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, pp. 97–101. Universiteit van Amsterdam (2001)
Dybvig, R.K., Peyton-Jones, S., Sabry, A.: A Monadic Framework for Delimited Continuations. Journal of Functional Programming 17(6), 687–730 (2007)
Felleisen, M.: The Theory and Practice of First-Class Prompts. In: 15th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 180–190 (1988)
Hayashishita, J.R.: ‘Syntactic Scope and Non-Syntactic Scope’. In: Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California (2003)
Kratzer, A.: Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide scope indefinites? In: Rothstein, S. (ed.) Events and Grammar, pp. 163–196. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)
Otake, R.: Delimited continuation in the grammar of Japanese. Talk presented at Continuation Fest, Tokyo (2008)
Partee, B., Rooth, M.: Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. In: Bauerle, R., Schwarze, C., Von Stechow, A. (eds.) Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, pp. 361–393. Walter De Gruyter Inc., Berlin (1983)
Plotkin, G.D.: Call-by-Name, Call-by Value and the Lambda Calculus. Theoretical Computer Science 1, 125–159 (1975)
Rooth, M.: A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116 (1992)
Shan, C.-c.: A continuation semantics of interrogatives that accounts for Baker’s ambiguity. In: Jackson, B. (ed.) Semantics and Linguistic Theory XII, Ithaca, pp. 246–265. Cornell University Press (2002)
Shan, C.-c.: Linguistic side effects. In: Barker, C., Jacobson, P. (eds.) Direct compositionality, pp. 132–163. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
Shan, C.-c., Barker, C.: Explaining Crossover and Superiority as Left-to-right Evaluation. Linguistics and Philosophy 29(1), 91–134 (2006)
Sitaram, D.: Handling Control. In: The ACM Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI 1993). ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol. 28, pp. 147–155. ACM Press, New York (1993)
Sitaram, D., Felleisen, M.: Control delimiters and their hierarchies. LISP and Symbolic Computation 3(1), 67–99 (1990)
Stratchey, C., Wadsworth, C.: ‘Continuations: a mathematical semantics for handling full jumps’. Technical report, Oxford University, Computing Laboratory (1974)
Wagner, M.: NPI-Licensing and Focus Movement. In: Georgala, E., Howell, J. (eds.) SALT XV, CLC Publications, Ithaca (2006)
Winter, Y.: Flexibility Principle in Boolean Semantics: coordination, plurality and scope in natural language. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bekki, D., Asai, K. (2010). Representing Covert Movements by Delimited Continuations. In: Nakakoji, K., Murakami, Y., McCready, E. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6284. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14888-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14888-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14887-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14888-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)