Abstract
This paper is divided into an empirical part and a theoretical part. The empirical part rediscovers a peculiar creature which was found by [Cooper, 1983] and then plunged back into the abyss of oblivion — indexical presuppositions, a special kind of “presuppositions” which can only, according to Cooper, be satisfied in the actual world. Cooper claimed that presuppositions of the gender features of free anaphoric pronouns induce such non-projecting “presuppositions”. I enlarge the empirical scope of the discovery by showing that, first, indexical presuppositions are induced by gender features of all anaphoric pronouns, not just the free ones; and second, that their satisfaction requirements are more complicated than simple “satisfaction in the actual world only.” On the theoretical side, I sketch three possible analyses of indexical presuppositions. The first one relies on direct copying of features from the antecedent, but meets certain serious problems. More work is needed in order to figure out if that theory can actually be worked out. The second theory employs a very complex constraint on choosing the name for the world variable of the pronoun, crucially using both syntax of the sentence and the model against which it is interpreted. The third one, in a sense the least conventional of all three, moves all the work to semantics, and analyzes indexical presuppositions as conditions on a rich structure of worlds, somewhat doubling the structure of embedding in the formula, which replaces the standard single possible world evaluation parameter.
This paper has benefitted greatly from the discussions with and comments of Simon Charlow, Patrick Grosz, Kai von Fintel, Irene Heim, Pauline Jacobson, Salvador Mascarenhas, Reinhard Muskens, Chris Potts, Philippe Schlenker, Anna Szabolcsi, and Hedde Zeijlstra, as well as with and of the audiences at the LF Reading Group at MIT in the Spring of 2009, the 2009 Southern New England Workshop in Semantics (SNEWS) at UMass, the Semantics Seminar at NYU, and LENLS VI workshop in Tokyo. All errors in the paper are, of course, mine. I also want to thank half a dozen of patient and generous English native speakers whose judgements I cite in the paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cooper, R.: Quantification and Syntactic Theory. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 21. Reidel, Dordrecht (1983)
Cresswell, M.: Entities and Indices. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1990)
Elbourne, P.: Situations and individuals. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Enç, M.: Tense without Scope: An Analysis of Nouns as Indexicals. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin (1981)
Gabbay, D.M.: Tense logics and the tenses in english. In: Moravcsik, J. (ed.) Logic and Philosophy for Linguists, Mouton, The Hague (1974)
Geurts, B.: Presuppositions and Pronouns. Elsevier, Oxford (1999)
Kamp, H.: Formal properties of “now”. Theoria 37, 227–273 (1971)
Kaplan, D.: Demonstratives. In: Almog, J., Perry, J., Wettstein, H. (eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)
Keshet, E.: Good Intensions: Paving Two Roads to a Theory of the De re/De dicto Distinction. PhD thesis, MIT (2008)
Kusumoto, K.: On the quantification over times in natural language. Natural Language Semantics 13, 317–357 (2005)
Percus, O.: Constraints on some other variables in syntax. Natural Language Semantics 8, 173–229 (2000)
Saarinen, E.: Backward-looking operators in tense logic and in natural language. In: Hintikka, J., Niiniluoto, I., Saarinen, E. (eds.) Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic, pp. 341–367. Reidel, Dordrecht (1978)
Schlenker, P.: A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 29–120 (2003)
Schlenker, P.: Ontological symmetry in language: A brief manifesto. Mind and Language 21(4), 504–539 (2005)
van der Sandt, R.: Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9, 333–377 (1992)
Vlach, F.: ‘Now’ and ‘Then’: A Formal Study in the Logic of Tense Anaphora. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (1973)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yanovich, I. (2010). On the Nature and Formal Analysis of Indexical Presuppositions. In: Nakakoji, K., Murakami, Y., McCready, E. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6284. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14888-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14888-0_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14887-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14888-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)