Skip to main content

Computing Minimal Models by Positively Minimal Disjuncts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (JSAI-isAI 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6284))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 797 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a method of computing minimal models in propositional logic. We firstly show that positively minimal disjuncts in DNF (Disjunctive Normal Form) of the original axiom corresponds with minimal models. A disjunct D is positively minimal if there is no disjunct which contains less positive literal than D. We show that using superset query and membership query which were used in some learning algorithms in computational learning theory, we can compute all the minimal models.

We then give a restriction and an extension of the method. The restriction is to consider a class of positive (sometimes called monotone) formula where minimization corresponds with diagnosis and other important problems in computer science. Then, we can replace superset query with sampling to give an approximation method. The algorithm itself has been already proposed by [Valiant84], but we show that the algorithm can be used to approximate a set of minimal models as well.

On the other hand, the extension is to consider circumscription with varied propositions. We show that we can compute equivalent formula of circumscription using a similar technique to the above.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angluin, D.: Queries and Concept Learning. Machine Learning 2, 319–342 (1988)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Balcázar, J.L., Castro, J.: A New Abstract Combinatorial Dimension for Exact Learning via Queries. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 64, 2–21 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Eliyahu, R., Dechter, R.: On Computing Minimal Models. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 18, 3–27 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Eliyahu-Zohary, R.: A Demand-Driven Algorithm for Generating Minimal Models. In: Proc. of AAAI-2000, pp. 267–272 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blum, A., Jackson, J.C., Sandholm, T., Zinkevich, M.: Preference Elicitation and Query Learning. In: COLT-2003, pp. 13–25 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bshouty, N.H., Cleve, R., Gavaldà, Kanna, S., Tamon, C.: Oracles and Queries that are Sufficient for Exact Learning. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 52, 421–433 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bshouty, N.H.: Exact Learning Boolean Functions via the Monotone Theory. Information and Computation 123, 146–153 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cadoli, M., Schaerf, M.: A Survey on Complexity Results for Non-monotonic Logics. Journal of Logic Programming 17(2-4), 127–160 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. de Kleer, J., Konolige, K.: Eliminating the Fixed Predicates from a Circumscription. Artificial Intelligence 39, 391–398 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Eiter, T., Gottlob, G.: Identifying the Minimal Transversals of a Hypergraph and Related Problems. SIAM Journal on Computing 24(6), 1278–1304 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gunopulos, D., Khardon, R., Mannila, H., Toivonen, H.: Data Mining, Hypergraph Transversals, and Machine Learning. In: Proc. of PODS-1997, pp. 209–216 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibaraki, T., Kameda, T.: A Boolean Theory of Coteries. In: Proc. of 3rd IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, pp. 150–157 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khardon, R., Roth, D.: Reasoning with Models. Artificial Intelligence 87, 187–213 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lifschitz, V.: Computing Circumscription. In: Proc. of IJCAI 1985, pp. 121–127 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCarthy, J.: Applications of Circumscription to Formalizing Common-Sense Knowledge. Artificial Intelligence 28, 89–116 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Reiter, R.: A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles. Artificial Intelligence 38, 49–73 (1987)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Satoh, K., Okamoto, H.: Computing Circumscriptive Databases by Integer Programming: Revisited. In: Proc. of AAAI 2000, pp. 429–435 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Valiant, L.G.: A Theory of the Learnable. CACM 27, 1134–1142 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Satoh, K. (2010). Computing Minimal Models by Positively Minimal Disjuncts. In: Nakakoji, K., Murakami, Y., McCready, E. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6284. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14888-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14888-0_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14887-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14888-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics