Skip to main content

Promotion of Selfish Agents in Hierarchical Organisations

  • Conference paper
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems V (COIN 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6069))

Abstract

In hierarchical organisations, a preferred outcome is to promote a more productive worker to a more influential status. However, productivity is rarely directly measurable, so an individual worker often has both motive and opportunity to misrepresent his productivity. This leads to an alternative possibility: the promotion of selfish individuals. We use an agent-based model to study how selfishness and competency of agents influence their promotion in hierarchical organisations. We consider the case where selfish agents can overstate their productivity and thus obtain undeserved promotions. Our results suggest that more productive agents reach positions of power most of the time. However, even under ideal conditions, selfish agents occasionally dominate the higher levels of a hierarchical organisation, which in turn has a dramatic effect on all lower levels. For organisations of around 100-10,000 employees with 3-4 hierarchy levels, on average, the promotion of selfish agents is minimized and the promotion of competent agents is maximized. Finally, we show that judging the productivity of an individual agent has a greater impact on promoting selfish behaviour than judging the productivity of an individual’s team. These results illustrate that agent-based models provide a powerful framework for examining how local interactions contribute to the large-scale properties of multi-layered organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderegg, L., Eidenbenz, S.: Ad hoc-VCG: A truthful and cost-efficient routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks with selfish agents. In: Proceedings of the nineth annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pp. 245–259 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Tardos, E., Wexler, T.: Near-optimal network design with selfish agents. In: Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 511–520 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, A.H., Gasser, L.: Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann publishers Inc., San Francisco (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., Platts, K.: Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 754–771 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C.: Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C.: The Role of Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6(3), 55–70 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastani, M., Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: Organizations and normative agents. LNCS, pp. 982–989. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G.G., Robinson, R.B.J.: Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately-Held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit. Strategic Management Journal, 265–273 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dignum, V., Meyer, J., Weigand, H., Dignum, F.: An organization-oriented model for agent societies. In: Proceedings of RASTA, at AAMAS02 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrido, L., Sycara, K., Brena, R.: Quantifying the utility of building agents models: An experimental study. In: Agents-00/ECML-00 Workshop on Learning Agents, Barcelona, Spain (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmytrasiewicz, P.J., Durfee, E.H.: Rational communication in multi-agent environments. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 4(3), 233–272 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D., Leishman, T., Sadedin, S.: The emergence of social consensus in simulation studies with boolean networks. In: PAAA World Congress on Social Simulation, Kyoto, Japan (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D., Sadedin, S., Leishman, T.: Systems theory - self-organization. Encyclopedia of Ecology 4, 3195–3203 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D.E.: Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 8, 263–276 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttmann, C.: Collective Iterative Allocation. PhD thesis, Monash University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horling, B., Lesser, V.: A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms. The Knowledge Engineering Review 19(04), 281–316 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, V.A.A., van Baalen, M.: Altruism through beard chromodynamics. Nature 440, 663–666 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., Murphy, K.: Performance pay and top-management incentives. J. Political Economy 98(1), 225 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacperski, K., Holyst, J.: Phase transitions as a persistent feature of groups with leaders in models of opinion formation. Physica A 287, 631 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M., Summers, D.: Doing Well While Doing Good: Dilemmas of Performance Measurement in Nonprofit Organizations and the Need for a Multipleconstituency Approach. In: McKevitt, D., Lawton, A. (eds.) Public Sector Management: Theory, Critique and Practice, New York State, United States of America, pp. 261–262. Open University Press, Stony Stratford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, J.R., Vlassis, N.: Mutual modeling of teammate behavior. Technical Report UVA-02-04, Computer Science Institute, University of Amsterdam, Netherland (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson, E., DeLoach, S.: Formal transition in agent organizations. In: Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, 2005, pp. 235–240 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisan, N.: Algorithms for Selfish Agents Mechanism Design for Distributed Computation. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, p. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plewczynski, D.: Landau theory of social clustering. Physica A 261, 608 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamoorthy, N., Carroll, S.: Individualism/Collectivism Orientations and Reactions Toward Alternative Human Resource Management Practices. Human Relations 51, 571–588 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, A.: Solving Optimization Problems among Selfish Agents. PhD thesis, Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Israel (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergot: Modelling unreliable and untrustworthy agent behaviour. In: Keplicz, B.D., Jankowski, A., Skowron, A., Szczuka, M. (eds.) International workshop on monitoring, security, and rescue technique in multiagent systems, Plock, Poland, pp. 161–177. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.G.: The contract net protocol: High-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on Computers 29(12), 1104–1113 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P., Riley, P., Veloso, M.M.: Defining and using ideal teammate and opponent agent models. In: Proceedings of the Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (IAAI), pp. 1040–1045 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, S., London, M.: Management promotions: Individual and organizational factors influencing the decision process. The Academy of Management Review 6(4), 539–549 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassileva, J., McCalla, G.I., Greer, J.E.: Multi-agent multi-user modeling in I-Help. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 13(1-2), 179–210 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N., Wooldridge, M.: Organizational abstractions for the analysis and design of multi-agent systems. In: Ciancarini, P., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) AOSE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1957, pp. 235–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sadedin, S., Guttmann, C. (2010). Promotion of Selfish Agents in Hierarchical Organisations. In: Padget, J., et al. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems V. COIN 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6069. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14962-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14962-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14961-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14962-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics