Skip to main content

Towards an Architecture for Self-regulating Agents: A Case Study in International Trade

  • Conference paper
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems V (COIN 2009)

Abstract

Norm-enforcement models applied in human societies may serve as an inspiration for the design of multi-agent systems. Models for norm-enforcement in multi-agent systems often focus either on the intra- or inter-agent level. We propose a combined approach to identify objectives for an architecture for self-regulating agents. In this paper we assess how changes on the inter-agent level affect the intra-agent level and how a generic BDI architecture IRMA can be adapted for self-regulation. The approach is validated with a case study of AEO certification, a European wide customs initiative to secure the supply chain while facilitating international trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese 152(2), 157–206 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H.: Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 12, 71–79 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Braithwaite, J.: Enforced self-regulation: a new strategy for corporate crime control. Michigan law review 80, 1466–1506 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bratman, M.E., Israel, D., Pollack, M.: Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. In: Cummins, R., Pollock, J.L. (eds.) Philosophy and AI: Essays at the Interface, pp. 1–22. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bresciani, P., Perini, A., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J.: Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 8, 203–236 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., van der Torre, L.: Goal generation in the BOID architecture. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2(3-4), 431–450 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burgemeestre, C.B., Liu, J., Hulstijn, J., Tan, Y.: Early Requirements Engineering for e-Customs Decision Support: Assessing Overlap in Mental Models. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE Forum, pp. 31–36 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burgemeestre, C.B., Hulstijn, J., Tan, Y.: Agent Architectures for Compliance. In: Aldewereld, H. (ed.) ESAW 2009. LNCS, vol. 5881, pp. 68–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. COSO enterprise risk management framework, http://www.coso.org

  11. Dignum, F.: Autonomous agents with norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7, 69–79 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. European Commission: AEO Guidelines, TAXUD/2006/1450 (2007), http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/policy_issues/

  13. Hindriks, K., van Riemsdijk, M.B.: Satisfying maintenance goals. In: Baldoni, M., Son, T.C., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Winikoff, M. (eds.) DALT 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4897, pp. 86–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Meneguzzi, F., Luck, M.: Norm-based behaviour modification in BDI agents. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’09), Budapest, Hungary, pp. 177–184 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modelling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’91), San Mateo CA (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rees, J.: Self-regulation: An Effective Alternative to Direct Regulation by OSHA? Policy Studies Journal 16(3), 602–614 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Sadiq, S.W., Governatori, G., Namiri, K.: Modeling control objectives for business process compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, E.K.S.: Towards Modelling and Reasoning Support for Early-Phase Requirements Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements engineering, pp. 226–235 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Burgemeestre, B., Hulstijn, J., Tan, YH. (2010). Towards an Architecture for Self-regulating Agents: A Case Study in International Trade. In: Padget, J., et al. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems V. COIN 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6069. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14962-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14962-7_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14961-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14962-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics