Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6232))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A new Ripple Down Rules based methodology which allows for the creation of rules that use classifications as conditions has been developed, and is entitled Multiple Classification Ripple Round Rules (MCRRR). Since it is difficult to recruit human experts in domains which are appropriate for testing this kind of method, simulated evaluation has been employed. This paper presents a simulated evaluation approach for assessing two separate aspects of the MCRRR method, which have been identified as potential areas of weakness. Namely, “Is the method useful in practice?” and “Is the method acceptable, computationally?” It was found that the method appears to be of value in some, but not many, “traditional” multi-class domains, and that due to computational concerns with one aspect of the method it is considered unsuitable for domains with a very large number of cases or rules. These issues are discussed and solutions are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kang, B., Compton, P., Preston, P.: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules: Evaluation and Possibilities. In: AIII-Sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems, Banff (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Compton, P., Preston, P., Kang, B.H.: The use of simulated experts in evaluating knowledge acquisition (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dazeley, R., Kang, B.H.: Rated MCRDR: Finding non-Linear Relationships Between Classifications in MCRDR (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kang, B.H.: Validating knowledge acquisition: multiple classification ripple-down rules. In: Computer Science and Engineering. University of New South Wales (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Compton, P., Jansen, R.: A philosophical basis for knowledge acquisition. In: European Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems, Paris (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Compton, P., Kang, B.H., Preston, P., Mulholland, M.: Knowledge Acquisition without Analysis. In: Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kang, B., Compton, P.: A Maintenance Approach to Case Based Reasoning. Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Preston, P., Edwards, G., Compton, P.: A 2000 Rule Expert System Without a Knowledge Engineer. In: AIII-Sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems, Banff (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Compton, P., Peters, L., Edwards, G., Lavers, T.G.: Experience with ripple-down rules. Knowledge Based Systems 19(5), 356–362 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarraf, Q., Ellis, G.: Business Rules in Retail: The Tesco.com Story (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vazey, M., Richards, D.: Troubleshooting at the Call Centre: A Knowledge-based Approach (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bindoff, I., Tenni, P., Peterson, G., Kang, B.H., Jackson, S.: Development of an intelligent decision support system for medication review. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 32(1), 81–88 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mulholland, M.: The Evaluation of the Applicability of Artificial Intelligence Software to Solving Problems in Ion Chromatography. In: Chemistry. University of New South Wales (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beydoun, G., Hoffmann, A.: NRDR for the Acquisition of Search Knowledge. LNCS, pp. 177–186. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Compton, P., Richards, D.: Extending ripple down rules (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Compton, P., Richards, D.: Generalising ripple-down rules. In: Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Methods, Models, Tools, pp. 2–6 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gaines, B.R.: Exception dags as knowledge structures

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kahn, A.B.: Topological sorting of large networks. Communications of the ACM 5(11), 558–562 (1962)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaines, B.R., Compton, P.J.: Induction of ripple down rules (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tsoumakas, G., Katakis, I.: Multi-Label Classification: An Overview. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining 3(3), 1–13 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Witten, I., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bindoff, I., Kang, B.H. (2010). Simulated Assessment of Ripple Round Rules. In: Kang, BH., Richards, D. (eds) Knowledge Management and Acquisition for Smart Systems and Services. PKAW 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6232. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15037-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15037-1_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15036-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15037-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics