Skip to main content

Abstract

The deregulation of electricity markets produced significant economic benefits, reducing prices to customers and opening several opportunities for new actors, e.g., new generators and distributors. A prominent scientific and technological challenge is the automation of such markets. In particular, we focus our attention on wholesale electricity markets based on a central auction. In these markets, generators sell electricity by means of a central auction to a public authority. Instead, the distribution of electricity to customers takes part in retail markets. The main works presented in the literature model wholesale markets as oligopolies, neglecting thus the specific auction mechanism. In this paper, we enrich these models by introducing an auction mechanism shaped on that used in the Italian wholesale electricity market, we solve the winner determination problem, and we preliminarily study the problem of searching for equilibria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hobbs, B.F.: Linear complementary models of Nash-Cournot competition in bilateral and POOLCO power markets. IEEE T Power Syst. 16(2), 194–202 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. GME: Gestore del mercato elettrico, http://www.mercatoelettrico.org

  3. Hobbs, B.F.: An oligopolistic power market model with tradable NO x permits. IEEE T Power Syst. 20(1), 119–129 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. AU: Acquirente unico, http://www.acquirenteunico.it

  5. PJM: Pjm interconnection, http://www.pjm.com

  6. Penya, Y.K., Jennings, N.R.: Optimal combinatorial electricity markets. International Journal of Web Intelligence and Agent Systems 6(2), 123–135 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sandholm, T.: Agents in electronic commerce: Component technologies for automated negotiation and coalition formation. Auton. Agent Multi-Ag 3(1), 73–96 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J.: Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Trigo, P., Marques, P.: The electricity market as a multi-agent system. In: Proc. IEEE EEM, Lisbon, Portugal, May 28-29, pp. 1–6 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sureka, A., Wurman, P.R.: Using tabu baset-response search to find pure strategy Nash equilibria in normal form games. In: Proc. AAMAS, July 25-29, pp. 1023–1029 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martello, S., Toth, P.: Knapsack Problems: Algorithms and Computer Implemenations. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rubinstein, A.: Comments on the interpretations of game theory. Econometrica 59(4), 909–924 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leyton-Brown, K., Shoham, Y.: Essential of Game Theory: a Concise, Multidisciplinary Introduction. Morgan and Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cressman, R.: Evolutionary Dynamics and Extensive Form Games. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jordan, P.R., Vorobeychik, Y., Wellman, M.P.: Searching for approximate equilibria in empirical games. In: Proc. AAMAS, Estoril, Portugal, pp. 1063–1070 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gatti, N., Di Giunta, F., Marino, S.: Alternating-offers bargaining with one-sided uncertain deadlines: an efficient algorithm. Artif. Intell. 172(8-9), 1119–1157 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. McAfee, R.P.: Mechanism design by competing sellers. Econometrica 61(6), 1281–1312 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ceppi, S., Gatti, N. (2010). A Study of Central Auction Based Wholesale Electricity Markets. In: David, E., Gerding, E., Sarne, D., Shehory, O. (eds) Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce. Designing Trading Strategies and Mechanisms for Electronic Markets. AMEC TADA 2009 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 59. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15117-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15117-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15116-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15117-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics