Skip to main content

A Concept Hierarchy Based Ontology Mapping Approach

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6291))

Abstract

Ontology mapping is one of the most important tasks for ontology interoperability and its main aim is to find semantic relationships between entities (i.e. concept, attribute, and relation) of two ontologies. However, most of the current methods only consider one to one (1:1) mappings. In this paper we propose a new approach (CHM: Concept Hierarchy based Mapping approach) which can find simple (1:1) mappings and complex (m:1 or 1:m) mappings simultaneously. First, we propose a new method to represent the concept names of entities. This method is based on the hierarchical structure of an ontology such that each concept name of entity in the ontology is included in a set. The parent-child relationship in the hierarchical structure of an ontology is then extended as a set-inclusion relationship between the sets for the parent and the child. Second, we compute the similarities between entities based on the new representation of entities in ontologies. Third, after generating the mapping candidates, we select the best mapping result for each source entity. We design a new algorithm based on the Apriori algorithm for selecting the mapping results. Finally, we obtain simple (1:1) and complex (m:1 or 1:m) mappings. Our experimental results and comparisons with related work indicate that utilizing this method in dealing with ontology mapping is a promising way to improve the overall mapping results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ehrig, M., Sure, Y.: Ontology mapping - an integrated approach. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 76–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: Qom - quick ontology mapping. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 683–697. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Prompt: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In: Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 12th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI/IAAI 2000), pp. 450–455 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Anchor-prompt: Using non-local context for semantic matching. In: Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at the 17th International Joint Conference on Articial Intelligence, IJCAI 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, W.M.: Information-flow-based ontology mapping. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., et al. (eds.) CoopIS 2002, DOA 2002, and ODBASE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2519, pp. 1132–1151. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Su, X., Gulla, J.A.: Semantic enrichment for ontology mapping. In: Meziane, F., Métais, E. (eds.) NLDB 2004. LNCS, vol. 3136, pp. 217–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. Journal of VLDB 10(4), 334–350 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: A survey of schema-based matching approaches. Journal of Data Semantics 4, 146–171 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y., Liu, W., Bell, D.: Combining uncertain outputs from multiple ontology matchers. In: Prade, H., Subrahmanian, V.S. (eds.) SUM 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4772, pp. 201–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Han, J., Kamber, M.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Navarro, G.: A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Computing Surveys 33(1), 31–88 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Winkler, W.E.: The state of record linkage and current research problems. In: Proceedings of the Survey Methods Section Statistical Society of Canada, pp. 73–80 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tang, J., Liang, B., Li, J.: Multiple strategies detection in ontology mapping. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2005) (Special interest tracks and posters), pp. 1040–1041 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P.A., Rahm, E.: Generic schema matching with cupid. In: Proceedings of 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 2001), pp. 49–58 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 1998), pp. 296–304 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: Proceedings of 14th International Joint Conference for Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995), pp. 448–453 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schickel-Zuber, V., Faltings, B.: OSS: A semantic similarity function based on hierarchical ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007), pp. 551–556 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. He, B., Chang, K.C.: Automatic complex schema matching across Web query interfaces: A correlation mining approach. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 31(1), 346–395 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qu, Y., Hu, W., Cheng, G.: Constructing virtual documents for ontology matching. In: Proceedings of 15th World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2006), pp. 23–31 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tang, J., Li, J., Liang, B., Huang, X., Li, Y., Wang, K.: Using Bayesian decision for ontology mapping. Journal of Web Semantics 4(4), 243–262 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hu, W., Zhao, Y., Qu, Y.: Partition-based block matching of large class hierarchies. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z.-Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) ASWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4185, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu, W., Qu, Y.: Block Matching for Ontologies. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 300–313. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, Y., Liu, W., Bell, D. (2010). A Concept Hierarchy Based Ontology Mapping Approach. In: Bi, Y., Williams, MA. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15279-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15280-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics