Skip to main content

Knowledge Merging under Multiple Attributes

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6291))

  • 1422 Accesses

Abstract

Knowledge merging is the process of synthesizing multiple knowledge models into a common model. Available methods concentrate on resolving conflicting knowledge. While, we argue that besides the inconsistency, some other attributes may also affect the resulting knowledge model. This paper proposes an approach for knowledge merging under multiple attributes, i.e. Consistency and Relevance. This approach introduces the discrepancy between two knowledge models and defines different discrepancy functions for each attribute. An integrated distance function is used for assessing the candidate knowledge models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lin, J., Mendelzon, A.O.: Merging databases under constraints. Int. J. of Cooperative Information Systems 7(1), 55–76 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Knight, K.: Measuring inconsistency. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31(1), 77–98 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Grant, J., Hunter, A.: Measuring inconsistency in knowledgebases. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 27, 159–184 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter, A., Konieczny, S.: Approaches to measuring inconsistent information. In: Bertossi, L., Hunter, A., Schaub, T. (eds.) Inconsistency Tolerance. LNCS, vol. 3300, pp. 191–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Mu, K., Jin, Z., Lu, R., Liu, W.: Measuring inconsistency in requirements specifications. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 440–451. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hunter, A., Konieczny, S.: Measuring inconsistency through minimal inconsistent sets. In: Priciples of knowledge representation and reasoning: Proceedings of the eleventh international conference (KR 2008), pp. 358–366 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grant, J., Hunter, A.: Analysing inconsistent first-order knowledge bases. Artificial Intelligence 172, 1064–1093 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter, A., Konieczny, S.: Approaches to measuring inconsistent information. In: Bertossi, L., Hunter, A., Schaub, T. (eds.) Inconsistency Tolerance. LNCS, vol. 3300, pp. 189–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Reiter, R.: A theory of diagnosis from first priniciples. Artificial Intelligence 32, 57–95 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Benferhat, S., Kaci, S., Le Berre, D., Williams, M.A.: Weakening conflicting information for iterated revision and knowledge integration. In: IJCAI, pp. 109–118 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer, T., Lee, K., Booth, R.: Knowledge integration for description logics. In: AAAI, pp. 645–650 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, J.: Integration of weighted knowledge bases. Artif. Intell. 83(2), 363–378 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Delgrande, J., Dubois, D., Lang, J.: Iterated revision as prioritized merging. In: KR 2006, pp. 210–220 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Konieczny, S., Pino Perez, R.: Merging information under constraints: a logical framework. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(5), 773–808 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma, Z.M.: Propositional knowledge bases merging. In: I-KNOW (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gregoire, E., Konieczny, S.: Logic-based approaches to information fusion. Information Fusion 7, 4–18 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hunter, A.: Merging potentially inconsistent items of structured text. Data and Knowledge Engineering 34, 305–332 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Gabbay, D.M., Pigozzi, G., Rodrigues, O.: Belief revision, belief merging and voting. In: The Seventh Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Games and Decision Theory, University of Liverpool, pp. 71–78 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gabrilovich, E., Markovitch, S.: Computing semantic relatedness using wikipedia-based explicit semantic analysis. In: Proceedings of The 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Hyderabad, India (January 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Milne, D.: Computing semantic relatedness using wikipedia link structure. In: NZ CSRSC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W., Laham, D.: Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25, 259–284 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wei, B., Jin, Z., Zowghi, D. (2010). Knowledge Merging under Multiple Attributes. In: Bi, Y., Williams, MA. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15279-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15280-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics