Skip to main content

Bisimilarity of One-Counter Processes Is PSPACE-Complete

  • Conference paper
CONCUR 2010 - Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6269))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1052 Accesses

Abstract

A one-counter automaton is a pushdown automaton over a singleton stack alphabet. We prove that the bisimilarity of processes generated by nondeterministic one-counter automata (with no ε-steps) is in PSPACE. This improves the previously known decidability result (Jančar 2000), and matches the known PSPACE lower bound (Srba 2009). We add the PTIME-completeness result for deciding regularity (i.e. finiteness up to bisimilarity) of one-counter processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balcázar, J.L., Gabarró, J., Santha, M.: Deciding Bisimilarity is P-Complete. Formal Asp. Comput. 4(6A), 638–648 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brázdil, T., Brozek, V., Etessami, K., Kučera, A., Wojtczak, D.: One-Counter Markov Decision Processes. In: Proc. of SODA, pp. 863–874. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Demri, S., Sangnier, A.: When Model-Checking Freeze LTL over Counter Machines Becomes Decidable. In: Ong, L. (ed.) FOSSACS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6014, pp. 176–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Glabbeek, R.v.: The Linear Time – Branching Time Spectrum I; The Semantics of Concrete, Sequential Processes. In: Bergstra, J., Ponse, A., Smolka, S. (eds.) Handbook of Process Algebra, ch. 1, pp. 3–99. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Göller, S., Mayr, R., To, A.W.: On the Computational Complexity of Verifying One-Coúnter Processes. In: Proc. of LICS, pp. 235–244. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haase, C., Kreutzer, S., Ouaknine, J., Worrell, J.: Reachability in succinct and parametric one-counter automata. In: Bravetti, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) CONCUR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5710, pp. 369–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirshfeld, Y., Jerrum, M.: Bisimulation Equivalence Is Decidable for Normed Process Algebra. In: Wiedermann, J., Van Emde Boas, P., Nielsen, M. (eds.) ICALP 1999. LNCS, vol. 1644, pp. 412–421. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Janin, D., Walukiewicz, I.: On the Expressive Completeness of the Propositional mu-Calculus with Respect to Monadic Second Order Logic. In: Sassone, V., Montanari, U. (eds.) CONCUR 1996. LNCS, vol. 1119, pp. 263–277. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jančar, P.: Decidability of Bisimilarity for One-Counter Processes. Information Computation 158(1), 1–17 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jančar, P.: Strong Bisimilarity on Basic Parallel Processes is PSPACE-complete. In: Proc. of LICS, pp. 218–227. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kanellakis, P.C., Smolka, S.A.: CCS Expressions, Finite State Processes, and Three Problems of Equivalence. Information and Computation 86(1), 43–68 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kučera, A.: Efficient Verification Algorithms for One-Counter Processes. In: Welzl, E., Montanari, U., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds.) ICALP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1853, pp. 317–328. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kučera, A., Mayr, R.: On the Complexity of Checking Semantic Equivalences between Pushdown Processes and Finite-state Processes. Inf. Comput. 208(7), 772–796 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayr, R.: Process Rewrite Systems. Information and Computation 156(1), 264–286 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayr, R.: Undecidability of Weak Bisimulation Equivalence for 1-Counter Processes. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 570–583. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. International Series in Computer Science. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Moller, F., Rabinovich, A.M.: Counting on CTL\(^{\mbox{*}}\): on the expressive power of monadic path logic. Inf. Comput. 184(1), 147–159 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Paige, R., Tarjan, R.E.: Three partition refinement algorithms. SIAM Journal on Computing 16(6), 973–989 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Sénizergues, G.: The Bisimulation Problem for Equational Graphs of Finite Out-Degree. SIAM J. Comput. 34(5), 1025–1106 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Serre, O.: Parity games played on transition graphs of one-counter processes. In: Aceto, L., Ingólfsdóttir, A. (eds.) FOSSACS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3921, pp. 337–351. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Srba, J.: Strong Bisimilarity and Regularity of Basic Process Algebra Is PSPACE-Hard. In: Widmayer, P., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Hennessy, M., Eidenbenz, S., Conejo, R. (eds.) ICALP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2380, pp. 716–727. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Srba, J.: Undecidability of Weak Bisimilarity for PA-Processes. In: Ito, M., Toyama, M. (eds.) DLT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2450, pp. 197–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Srba, J.: Roadmap of Infinite results. Formal Models and Semantics, vol. 2. World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore (2004), http://www.brics.dk/~srba/roadmap

    Google Scholar 

  24. Srba, J.: Beyond Language Equivalence on Visibly Pushdown Automata. Logical Methods in Computer Science 5(1:2) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stirling, C.: Decidability of Bisimulation Equivalence for Pushdown Processes (2000) (unpublished manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  26. To, A.W.: Model Checking FO(R) over One-Counter Processes and beyond. In: Grädel, E., Kahle, R. (eds.) CSL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5771, pp. 485–499. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Valiant, L.G., Paterson, M.: Deterministic one-counter automata. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 10(3), 340–350 (1975)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. van Benthem, J.: Modal Correspondence Theory. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yen, H.-C.: Complexity Analysis of Some Verification Problems for One-Counter Machines (20xx) (unpublished manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Böhm, S., Göller, S., Jančar, P. (2010). Bisimilarity of One-Counter Processes Is PSPACE-Complete. In: Gastin, P., Laroussinie, F. (eds) CONCUR 2010 - Concurrency Theory. CONCUR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6269. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15375-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15375-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15374-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15375-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics