Skip to main content

Learning Negotiation Policies Using IB3 and Bayesian Networks

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2010 (IDEAL 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6283))

Abstract

This paper presents an intelligent offer policy in a negotiation environment, in which each agent involved learns the preferences of its opponent in order to improve its own performance. Each agent must also be able to detect drifts in the opponent’s preferences so as to quickly adjust itself to their new offer policy. For this purpose, two simple learning techniques were first evaluated: (i) based on instances (IB3) and (ii) based on Bayesian Networks. Additionally, as its known that in theory group learning produces better results than individual/single learning, the efficiency of IB3 and Bayesian classifier groups were also analyzed. Finally, each decision model was evaluated in moments of concept drift, being the drift gradual, moderate or abrupt. Results showed that both groups of classifiers were able to effectively detect drifts in the opponent’s preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aha, D.W., Kibler, D., Albert, M.K.: Instance-based Learning Algorithms. Machine Learning 6(1), 37–66 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coehoorn, R.M., Jennings, N.R.: Learning an Opponent’s Preferences to Make Effective Multi-Issue Negotiation Trade-Offs. In: Proc. of the Sixth International Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 59–68 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Norsys Software Corp., Netica-j manual (2009), http://www.norsys.com/neticaj/docs/netica#jman.pdf

  4. Enembreck, F., Avila, B.C., Scalabrin, E.E., Barthès, J.-P.: Drifting Negotiations. Applied Artificial Intelligence 21(9), 861–881 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enembreck, F., Tacla, C.A., Barthès, J.P.: Learning Negotiation Policies Using Ensemble-Based Drift Detection Techniques. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools 18(2), 173–196 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hindriks, K., Tykhonov, D.: Opponent modelling in automated multi-issue negotiation using bayesian learning. In: AAMAS’08: Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 331–338 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kersten, G.E., Michalowski, W., Szpakowicz, S., Koperczak, Z.: Restructurable representations of negotiation. Manage. Sc. 37(10), 1269–1290 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Klinkenberg, R., Renz, I.: Adaptive Information Filtering: Learning in the Presence of Concept Drifts. In: ICML-98, pp. 33–40 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kolter, J.Z., Maloof, M.A.: Dynamic Weighted Majority: A New Ensemble Method for Tracking Concept Drift, p. 123. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Littlestone, N., Warmuth, M.: The Weighted Majority algorithm. Information and Computation 108, 212–261 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Opitz, D., Maclin, R.: Popular ensemble methods: An empirical study. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11, 169–198 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruggeri, F., Faltin, F., Kenett, R.: Bayesian Networks. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality & Reliability. Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Russell, S., Norving, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zeng, D., Sycara, K.: Bayesian learning in negotiation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 48(1), 125–141 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nalepa, G.M., Ávila, B.C., Enembreck, F., Scalabrin, E.E. (2010). Learning Negotiation Policies Using IB3 and Bayesian Networks. In: Fyfe, C., Tino, P., Charles, D., Garcia-Osorio, C., Yin, H. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2010. IDEAL 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6283. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15381-5_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15381-5_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15380-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15381-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics