Skip to main content

Discovering Concept Mappings by Similarity Propagation among Substructures

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2010 (IDEAL 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6283))

Abstract

Concept matching is important when heterogeneous data sources are to be merged for the purpose of knowledge sharing. It has many useful applications in areas such as schema matching, ontology matching, scientific knowledge management, e-commerce, enterprise application integration, etc. With the desire of knowledge sharing and reuse in these fields, merging commonly occurs among different organizations where the knowledge describing the same domain is to be matched. Due to the different naming conventions, granularity and the use of concepts in different contexts, a semantic approach to this problem is preferred in comparison to syntactic approach that performs matches based upon the labels only. We propose a concept matching method that initially does not consider labels when forming candidate matches, but rather utilizes structural information to take the context into account and detect complex matches. Real world knowledge representations (schemas) are used to evaluate the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P.A., Rahm, E.: Genereic Schema Matching with Cupid. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on very Large Data Bases (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Melnik, S., Molina-Garcia, H., Rahm, E.: Similarity flooding: a versatile graph matching algorithm. In: Proceedings of ICDE-02 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Noy, N.F.: Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches. SIGMOD Record 33(4), 65–70 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P.: Semantic matching. In: Ontologies and Distributed Systems Workshop, IJCAI (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: A survey of schema-based matching approaches. Journal on Data Semantics IV (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doan, A., Halevy, A.: Semantic integration research in the database community: A brief survey. AI Magazine (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernstein, P.A., Melnik, S., Churchill, J.E.: Incremental schema matching. In: Proc. of the 32nd Int’l Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 1167–1170 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drumm, C., Schmitt, M., Do, H.: QuickMig - Automatic Schema Matching for Data Migration Projects. In: Proc. ACM CIKM, Lisabon (November 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amarintrarak, N., Runapongsa, S.K., Tongsima, S., Wiwatwattana, N.: SAXM: Semi-automatic XML Schema Mapping. In: The 24th International Technical Conference on Circuits/Systems, Computers and Communications, ITC-CSCC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheth, A., Larson, J.: Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Comp. Surveys 22(3), 183–230 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Das, S., Chong, E.I., Eadon, G., Srinivasan, J.: Supporting ontology-based semantic matching in RDBMS. In: Proc. of 13th VLDB Conf., pp. 1054–1065 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ge, J., Qiu, Y.: Concept Similarity Matching Based on Semantic Distance. In: Proc. of the 2008 4th Int’l Conf. on Semantics, Knowledge and Grid, SKG (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cruz, I.F., Antonelli, F.P., Stroe, C.: AgreementMaker: Efficient Matching for Large Real-World Schemas and Ontologie. In: Proceedings of VLDB, Demo (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Comm. of the ACM 38(11) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tan, H., Dillon, T.S., Hadzic, F., Feng, L., Chang, E.: IMB3-Miner: Mining Induced/Embedded Subtrees by Constraining the Level of Embedding. In: Proc. of the 10th Pacific-Asia Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: S-Match: an Algorithm and an Implementation of Semantic Matching. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pan, Q.H., Hadzic, F., Dillon, T.S. (2010). Discovering Concept Mappings by Similarity Propagation among Substructures. In: Fyfe, C., Tino, P., Charles, D., Garcia-Osorio, C., Yin, H. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2010. IDEAL 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6283. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15381-5_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15381-5_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15380-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15381-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics