Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6278))

Abstract

Nowadays, web users are facing a novel and dynamically changing environment, which promotes collaboration in content creation. In the web era, people usually neglected the quality of content, and had minimum authority on reporting good or bad content, whereas, in Web 2.0, content is becoming a priority and people become more critical when they assess its quality. In the former case, each web site had an identity, a single editor or a closed group of editors, who were responsible for content quality management and the stylistic design was the main quality standard for visitors. In the latter case, several applications and a new way of thinking have changed the workplace and created a new approach to quality management. Specifically, the team of editors is open to every web user, content is a collaborative product and the “embedded object” or “inline linking” model is gaining in popularity against hyperlinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, B.T., de Alfaro, L.: A content-driven reputation system for the Wikipedia. In: Proc. of the 16th Intl. World Wide Web Conf. (WWW 2007), ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akdeniz, Y.: Controlling Illegal and Harmful Content on the Internet. In: Wall, D.S. (ed.) Crime and the Internet, pp. 113–140. Routledge, London (November 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Athanasiadis, T., Avrithis, Y.: Adding Semantics to Audiovisual Content: The FAETHON Project. In: Enser, P.G.B., Kompatsiaris, Y., O’Connor, N.E., Smeaton, A., Smeulders, A.W.M. (eds.) CIVR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3115, pp. 665–673. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avouris, N., Solomos, K.: Social mechanisms for content quality control in web-based learning: An agent approach. In: Jacko, J., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 1, pp. 891–895. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Mahwah (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caballero, I., Verbo, E., Serrano, M., Calero, C., Piattini, M.: Tailoring Data Quality Models Using Social Network Preferences. In: Chen, L., Liu, C., Liu, Q., Deng, K. (eds.) DASFAA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5667, pp. 152–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, R., Vassileva, J.: Adaptive Reward Mechanism for Sustainable Online Learning Community. In: Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 152–159 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cusinato, A., Della Mea, V., Di Salvatore, F., Mizzaro, S.: QuWi: quality control in Wikipedia. In: 3rd workshop on Information credibility on the web, WICOW 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Day, M.: The Long-Term Preservation of Web Content. In: Web Archiving, pp. 177–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2006), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-46332-0_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Fogg, B., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D., Marable, L., Stanford, J., Tauber, E.: How Do People Evaluate a Web Site’s Credibility? A Consumer WebWatch research report. Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab, Cordura Hall 226, Stanford University, Stanford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B., Scott, J.: Social Bookmarking Tools (I): A General Review. D-Lib Magazine 11(4) (April 2005), ISSN 1082-9873

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jung, K., Kim, K.I., Jain, A.K.: Text information extraction in images and video: a survey. Pattern Recognition 37(5), 977–997 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kolbitsch, J., Maurer, H.: The Transformation of the Web: How Emerging Communities Shape the Information we Consume. Journal for Universal Computer Science 12(2) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, C., Kim, Y., Rhee, P.: Web personalization expert with combining collaborative filtering and association rule mining technique. Expert Systems with Applications 21, 131–137 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lerman, K.: Dynamics of a Collaborative Rating System. In: Zhang, H., Spiliopoulou, M., Mobasher, B., Giles, C.L., McCallum, A., Nasraoui, O., Srivastava, J., Yen, J. (eds.) WebKDD 2007. LNCS, vol. 5439, pp. 77–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Q., Lin, X.: Genomic Information Quality. In: Proceedings of DASFAA Workshop on Managing Data Quality in Collaborative Information Systems, New Delhi, India (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Louta, M., Varlamis, I.: Blog rating as an iterative collaborative process. In: Semantics in Adaptive and Personalised Services: Methods, Tools and Applications. Springer series on Studies in Computational Intelligence (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lowry, P.B., Roberts, T.L., Higbee, T.: First Impressions with Websites: The Effect of the Familiarity and Credibility of Corporate Logos on Perceived Consumer Swift Trust of Websites. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4553, pp. 77–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Lund, D., Hammond, T., Flack, M., Hannay, T.: Social Bookmarking Tools (II): A Case Study – Connotea. D-Lib Magazine 11(4) (April 2005), ISSN 1082-9873

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mateo, M.A., Leung, C.: CHARIOT: A Comprehensive Data Integration and Quality Assurance Model for Agro-Meteorological Data. In: Proceedings of DASFAA Workshop on Managing Data Quality in Collaborative Information Systems, New Delhi, India (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. O’Reilly, T.: What Is Web 2.0. O’Reilly Network (2005), http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html (Retrieved 2010-02-02)

  21. Schroeter, R., Hunter, J., Kosovic, D.: FilmEd - Collaborative Video Indexing, Annotation and Discussion Tools Over Broadband Networks. In: International Conference on Multi-Media Modeling, Brisbane, Australia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Varlamis, I., Louta, M.: Towards a Personalized Blog Site Recommendation System: a Collaborative Rating Approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Media Adaptation and Personalization, San Sebastian, Spain (December 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Varlamis, I., Giannakoulopoulos, A., Gouscos, D.: Increased content accessibility for wikis and blogs. In: Proceeding of the 4th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems MCIS 2009, Athens, Greece (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vickery, G., Wunsch-Vincent, S.: Participative Web and User-created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking. In: OECD 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: A social mechanism of reputation management in electronic communities. In: Klusch, M., Kerschberg, L. (eds.) CIA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1860, pp. 154–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Varlamis, I. (2010). Quality of Content in Web 2.0 Applications. In: Setchi, R., Jordanov, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6278. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15393-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15393-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15392-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15393-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics