Skip to main content

A Framework for Graph-Based Parsing of German Private Law Decisions

  • Conference paper
Business Information Systems Workshops (BIS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 57))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 941 Accesses

Abstract

We present a work in progress report of our research on automatically analyzing German court decisions. For accessibility to information retrieval and text summarization processing, we show concepts of a parsing framework dealing with linguistic features of this genre. To cover these features, we first developed a description language inferred from content structure analysis presented before. The main aspect of this paper is the presentation of a graph-based parsing framework concept. The parser will be able to label the content structure of German court decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angelova, R., Weikum, G.: Graph-based Text Classification: Learn from Your Neighbors. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, Seattle (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bieler, H., Dipper, S., Stede, M.: Identifying formal and functional zones in film reviews. In: Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Antwerpen (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dipper, S.: XML-based Stand-off Representation and Exploitation of Multi-Level Linguistic Annotation. In: Proc. of Berliner XML-Tage (BXML 2005), pp. 39–50 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Engberg, J.: Signalfunktion und Kodierungsgrad von sprachlichen Merkmalen in Gerichtsurteilen. Hermes - Journal of Language and Communication Studies (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freeman, J.: Dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments: A theory of argument structure. Foris, Berlin (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hanneforth, T., Heintze, S., Stede, M.: Rhetorical Parsing with Underspecification and Forests. In: Proceedings of the HLT/NAACL Conference 2003, Companions Volume. Edmonton/AL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hachey, B., Grover, C.: Extractive summarization of legal texts. Artificial Intelligence and Law 14, 305–345 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marcu, D.: The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michalcea, R.: Graph-based Ranking Algorithms for Sentence Extraction, Applied to Text Summarization. In: Proc. of ACL, Barcelona (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moens, M.-F., Uyttendaele, C., Dumortier, J.: Abstracting of Legal Cases: The SALOMON Experience. In: Proc. of the 6th Int’l Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Melbourne (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Radev, D.R.: Weakly-Supervised Graph-based Methods for Classification. U. Michigan Technical Report CSE-TR-500-04 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rave, D., et al.: Paraphrasen juristischer Texte, Darmstadt (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stede, M., Bieler, H., Dipper, S., Suryiawongkul, A.: SUMMaR: Combining linguistics and statistics for text summarization. In: Proceedings of ECAI, Riva del Garda (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stede, M., Sauermann, A.: Linearization of arguments in commentary texts. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Multidisciplinary Approaches to Discourse, Oslo (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stede, M., Kuhn, F.: Identifying the Content Zones of German Court Decisions. In: 2nd LIT 2009 Proceedings, Poznan (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stede, M., Kuhn, F.: Document Structure and Argumentation in German Court Decisions. In: ICAIL 2009 NaLEA Workshop, Barcelona (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Teufel, S., Moens, M.: Summarizing Scientific Articles – Experiments with Relevance and Rhetorical Status. Computational Linguistics 28(4) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Walter, S., Pinkal, M.: Linguistic support for legal ontology construction. In: Proceedings of ICAIL, pp. 242–243 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuhn, F. (2010). A Framework for Graph-Based Parsing of German Private Law Decisions. In: Abramowicz, W., Tolksdorf, R., Węcel, K. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 57. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15402-7_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15402-7_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15401-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15402-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics