Abstract
The modeling of business process is a crucial task in business-based system engineering, from system analysis to simulation. In recent years, several languages to model business processes have been proposed. However, those languages usually lack full integration with other organization structural models, limiting its applicability to real systems. This paper introduces a framework that helps describe business processes and structural organization models in an integrated manner. The framework includes a conceptual model to represent, with enriched semantics, the structure and behavior of an organization, including support for BPMN-based business process models. Several research results point to ontologies as a suitable technology for semantically modeling enterprise systems, from both structural and behavioral perspectives. In this regard, the framework makes use of a set of ontologies in the Web Ontology Language (OWL) [1], which allows implicit knowledge about organizations structure and behavior to be inferred.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Parsia, B.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax. In: W3C OWL Working Group (October 2009)
Dayal, U., Hsu, M., Ladin, R.: Business process coordination: State of the art, trends, and open issues. In: 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 3–13 (2001)
Baisley, D., Björkander, M., Bock, C., Cook, S., Desfray, P., Dykman, N., Ek, A., Frankel, D., Gery, E., Haugen, Ø., Iyengar, S., Kobryn, C., Møller-Pedersen, B., Odell, J., Övergaard, G., Palmkvist, K., Ramackers, G., Rumbaugh, J., Selic, B., Weigert, T., Williams, L.: OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Superstructure v 2.2. Object Managment Group (OMG) (February 2009)
OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) v1.2. Object Managment Group (OMG) (2008)
Tyler, C.G., Baker, S.R.: Business Genetics. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2007)
Szymczak, M., Frackowiak, G., Ganzha, M., Gawinecki, M., Paprzycki, M., Park, M.W.: Resource management, pp. 458–462 (November 2007)
Barjis, J.: The importance of business process modeling in software systems design. Science of Computer Programming 71(1), 73–87 (2008)
Garrido, J., Gea, M., Rodríguez, M.: Requirements engineering in cooperative systems. In: Requirements Engineering for Sociotechnical Systems, pp. 226–244 (2005)
Noguera, M., Hurtado, M.V., Rodríguez, M.L., Chung, L., Garrido, J.L.: Ontology-driven analysis of uml-based collaborative processes using owl-dl and cpn. Science of Computer Programming 75(8), 726–760 (2009)
Golbreich, C., Wallace, E.K.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language New Features and Rationale. In: W3C OWL Working Group. (2009)
Hepp, M., Roman, D.: An ontology framework for semantic business process management. In: Proceedings of Wirtschaftsinformatik, vol. 2007 (2007)
Dietz, J.L.G.: System ontology and its role in software development. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE 2005 workshop Interop-EMOI (2005)
Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Enterprise ontology in enterprise engineering. In: SAC 2008: Proceedings of the, ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 572–579. ACM, New York(2008)
Wahl, T., Sindre, G.: An analytical evaluation of bpmn using a semiotic quality framework. In: Castro, J., Teniente, E.(eds.): Proceedings of the CAiSE 2005 Workshops, vol. 1, pp. 533–544 (2005)
Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W.M., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H., Russell, N.: On the suitability of bpmn for business process modelling. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 161–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
van der Aalst, W., ter Hofstede, A., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.: Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)
Nysetvold, A., Krogstie, J.: Assessing business process modeling languages using a generic quality framework. In: Castro, J., Teniente, E. (eds.): Proceedings of the CAiSE 2005 Workshops, vol. 1, pp. 545–556 (2005)
Krogstie, J.: Using eeml for combined goal and process oriented modeling: A case study. In: Proceedings of EMMSAD 2008 (2008)
Ghidini, C., Rospocher, M., Serafini, L.: A formalisation of bpmn in description logics. Technical report (2008)
Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: Swrl: A semantic web rule language combining owl and ruleml. Technical report, W3C Member Submission (2004)
Gruber, T.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition (January 1993)
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Scientific American (May 1998)
Boley, H.: The rule markup language: Rdf-xml data model, xml schema hierarchy, and xsl transformations. In: Bartenstein, O., Geske, U., Hannebauer, M., Yoshie, O. (eds.) INAP 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2543, pp. 5–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Noguera, M.: Modeling and Analysis of CSCW Systems: an Ontology Driven Engineering Approach (Modelado y Análisis de Sistemas CSCW Siguiendo un Enfoque de Ingeniería Dirigida por Ontologías). PhD thesis, Universidad de Granada (May 2009)
W3C: Defining n-ary relations on the semantic web. W3C Working Group Note (April 2006)
White, S.A.: Process modeling notations and workflow patterns. BPTrends (2004)
Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R., Noy, N., Musen, M.: The protege OWL plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 229–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Parsia, B., Sirin, E.: Pellet: An owl dl reasoner. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (2003, 2004)
White, S.A.: Business process modeling notation (bpmn), v. 2.0 beta. Technical report, Object Management Group (September 2009)
Barreto, C., Bullard, V., Erl, T., Jordan, D., Kand, K., König, D., Moser, S., Stout, R., Ten-Hove, R., Trickovic, I., van der Rijn, D., Yiu, A.: Web services business process execution language. Technical report, OASIS (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pelegrina, A.B., Benghazi, K., Hurtado, M.V., Noguera, M. (2010). A Framework for the Semantic Representation of Business Processes within Business Organizational Models. In: Barjis, J. (eds) Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation. EOMAS 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 63. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15723-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15723-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15722-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15723-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)