Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper describes the experience of QAST 2009, the third time a pilot track of CLEF has been held aiming to evaluate the task of Question Answering in Speech Transcripts. Four sites submitted results for at least one of the three scenarios (European Parliament debates in English and Spanish and broadcast news in French). In order to assess the impact of potential errors of automatic speech recognition (ASR), for each task manual transcripts and three different ASR outputs were provided. In addition an original method of question creation was tried in order to get spontaneous oral questions resulting in two sets of questions (spoken and written). Each participant who had chosen a task was asked to submit a run for each condition. The QAST 2009 evaluation framework is described, along with descriptions of the three scenarios and their associated data, the system submissions for this pilot track and the official evaluation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fiscus, J.: A post-processing system to yield reduced word error rates: Recogniser output voting error reduction (rover). In: Proceedings 1997 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 347–352 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Galliano, S., Geoffrois, E., Gravier, G., Bonastre, J.F., Mostefa, D., Choukri, K.: Corpus description of he ESTER Evaluation Campaign for the Rich Transcriptionof French Broadcast News. In: Proceedings of LREC 2006, Genoa, pp. 315–320 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peters, C., Clough, P., Gey, F.C., Karlgren, J., Magnini, B., Oard, D.W., de Rijke, M., Stempfhuber, M. (eds.): CLEF 2006. LNCS, vol. 4730. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. TC-Star (2004-2008), http://www.tc-star.org

  5. Turmo, J., Comas, P.R., Ayache, C., Mostefa, D., Rosset, S., Lamel, L.: Overview of qast 2007. In: Peters, C., Jijkoun, V., Mandl, T., Müller, H., Oard, D.W., Peñas, A., Petras, V., Santos, D. (eds.) CLEF 2007. LNCS, vol. 5152, pp. 249–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Turmo, J., Comas, P.R., Rosset, S., Lamel, L., Moreau, N., Mostefa, D.: Overview of qast 2008. In: Peters, C., Deselaers, T., Ferro, N., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kurimo, M., Mandl, T., Peñas, A., Petras, V. (eds.) CLEF 2008. LNCS, vol. 5706, pp. 314–324. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Voorhees, E.M., Buckland, L.L. (eds.): The Fifteenth Text Retrieval Conference Proceedings, TREC 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Turmo, J. et al. (2010). Overview of QAST 2009. In: Peters, C., et al. Multilingual Information Access Evaluation I. Text Retrieval Experiments. CLEF 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6241. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15754-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15754-7_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15753-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15754-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics