Abstract
Proving termination of sequential programs is an important problem, both for establishing the total correctness of systems and as a component of proving more general termination and liveness properties. We present a new algorithm, TRex, that determines if a sequential program terminates on all inputs. The key characteristic of TRex is that it alternates between refining an over-approximation and an under-approximation of each loop in a sequential program. In order to prove termination, TRex maintains an over-approximation of the set of states that can be reached at the head of the loop. In order to prove non-termination, it maintains an under-approximation of the set of paths through the body of the loop. The over-approximation and under-approximation are used to refine each other iteratively, and help TRex to arrive quickly at a proof of either termination or non-termination.
TRex refines the approximations in alternation by composing three different program analyses: (1) local termination provers that can quickly handle intricate loops, but not whole programs, (2) non-termination provers that analyze one cycle through a loop, but not all paths, and (3) global safety provers that can check safety properties of large programs, but cannot check liveness properties. This structure allows TRex to be instantiated using any of the pre-existing techniques for proving termination or non-termination of individual loops.
We evaluated TRex by applying it to prove termination or find bugs for a set of real-world programs and termination analysis benchmarks. Our results demonstrate that alternation allows TRex to prove termination or produce certified termination bugs more effectively than previous techniques.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beckman, N.E., Nori, A.V., Rajamani, S.K., Simmons, R.J.: Proofs from tests. In: ISSTA, pp. 3–14 (2008)
Berdine, J., Chawdhary, A., Cook, B., Distefano, D., O’Hearn, P.: Variance analyses from invariance analyses. In: POPL, pp. 211–224. ACM, New York (2007)
Berdine, J., Cook, B., Distefano, D., O’Hearn, P.W.: Automatic termination proofs for programs with shape-shifting heaps. In: Ball, T., Jones, R.B. (eds.) CAV 2006. LNCS, vol. 4144, pp. 386–400. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Bradley, A.R., Manna, Z., Sipma, H.B.: Linear ranking with reachability. In: Etessami, K., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) CAV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3576, pp. 491–504. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Bradley, A.R., Manna, Z., Sipma, H.B.: The polyranking principle. In: Caires, L., Italiano, G.F., Monteiro, L., Palamidessi, C., Yung, M. (eds.) ICALP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3580, pp. 1349–1361. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Bradley, A.R., Manna, Z., Sipma, H.B.: Termination analysis of integer linear loops. In: Abadi, M., de Alfaro, L. (eds.) CONCUR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3653, pp. 488–502. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Chawdhary, A., Cook, B., Gulwani, S., Sagiv, M., Yang, H.: Ranking abstractions. In: Drossopoulou, S. (ed.) ESOP 2008. LNCS, vol. 4960, pp. 148–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Cook, B., Gulwani, S., Lev-Ami, T., Rybalchenko, A., Sagiv, M.: Proving conditional termination. In: Gupta, A., Malik, S. (eds.) CAV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5123, pp. 328–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Cook, B., Podelski, A., Rybalchenko, A.: Abstraction refinement for termination. In: Hankin, C., Siveroni, I. (eds.) SAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3672, pp. 87–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Cook, B., Podelski, A., Rybalchenko, A.: Termination proofs for systems code. In: PLDI, pp. 415–426 (2006)
Godefroid, P., Nori, A.V., Rajamani, S.K., Tetali, S.D.: Compositional must program analysis: Unleashing the power of alternation. In: POPL, pp. 43–56 (2010)
Gotsman, A., Cook, B., Parkinson, M., Vafeiadis, V.: Proving that non-blocking algorithms don’t block. In: POPL, pp. 16–28 (2009)
Gulavani, B.S., Henzinger, T.A., Kannan, Y., Nori, A.V., Rajamani, S.K.: SYNERGY: a new algorithm for property checking. In: FSE, pp. 117–127 (2006)
Gupta, A., Henzinger, T.A., Majumdar, R., Rybalchenko, A., Xu, R.-G.: Proving non-termination. In: POPL, pp. 147–158 (2008)
Harris, W.R., Lal, A., Nori, A.V., Rajamani, S.K.: Alternation for Termination. Technical Report MSR-TR-2010-61, Microsoft Research India (May 2010)
Tiwari, A.: Termination of linear programs. In: Alur, R., Peled, D.A. (eds.) CAV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3114, pp. 70–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Harris, W.R., Lal, A., Nori, A.V., Rajamani, S.K. (2010). Alternation for Termination. In: Cousot, R., Martel, M. (eds) Static Analysis. SAS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6337. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15769-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15769-1_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15768-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15769-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)