Skip to main content

Top-k Ranked Document Search in General Text Databases

  • Conference paper
Algorithms – ESA 2010 (ESA 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6347))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Text search engines return a set of k documents ranked by similarity to a query. Typically, documents and queries are drawn from natural language text, which can readily be partitioned into words, allowing optimizations of data structures and algorithms for ranking. However, in many new search domains (DNA, multimedia, OCR texts, Far East languages) there is often no obvious definition of words and traditional indexing approaches are not so easily adapted, or break down entirely. We present two new algorithms for ranking documents against a query without making any assumptions on the structure of the underlying text. We build on existing theoretical techniques, which we have implemented and compared empirically with new approaches introduced in this paper. Our best approach is significantly faster than existing methods in RAM, and is even three times faster than a state-of-the-art inverted file implementation for English text when word queries are issued.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anh, V., Moffat, A.: Pruned query evaluation using pre-computed impacts. In: Proc. 29th ACM SIGIR, pp. 372–379 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Apostolico, A.: The myriad virtues of subword trees. In: Combinatorial Algorithms on Words. NATO ISI Series, pp. 85–96. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Modern Information Retrieval. Addison Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bender, M., Farach-Colton, M.: The LCA problem revisited. In: Gonnet, G.H., Viola, A. (eds.) LATIN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1776, pp. 88–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferragina, P., Manzini, G., Mäkinen, V., Navarro, G.: Compressed representations of sequences and full-text indexes. ACM TALG 3(2), article 20 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer, J., Heun, V.: A new succinct representation of RMQ-information and improvements in the enhanced suffix array. In: Chen, B., Paterson, M., Zhang, G. (eds.) ESCAPE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4614, pp. 459–470. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Gagie, T., Puglisi, S., Turpin, A.: Range quantile queries: Another virtue of wavelet trees. In: Karlgren, J., Tarhio, J., Hyyrö, H. (eds.) SPIRE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5721, pp. 1–6. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Grossi, R., Gupta, A., Vitter, J.: High-order entropy-compressed text indexes. In: Proc. 14th SODA, pp. 841–850 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hon, W.-K., Shah, R., Vitter, J.S.: Space-efficient framework for top-k string retrieval problems. In: Proc. FOCS, pp. 713–722 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manber, U., Myers, G.: Suffix arrays: a new method for on-line string searches. SIAM J. Computing 22(5), 935–948 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Manzini, G.: An analysis of the Burrows-Wheeler transform. J. ACM 48(3), 407–430 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Muthukrishnan, S.: Efficient algorithms for document retrieval problems. In: Proc. 13th SODA, pp. 657–666 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Navarro, G., Mäkinen, V.: Compressed full-text indexes. ACM Computing Surveys 39(1), article 2 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Persin, M., Zobel, J., Sacks-Davis, R.: Filtered document retrieval with frequency-sorted indexes. JASIS 47(10), 749–764 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ponte, J.M., Croft, W.B.: A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In: Proc. 21th ACM SIGIR, pp. 275–281 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Puglisi, S., Smyth, W., Turpin, A.: Inverted files versus suffix arrays for locating patterns in primary memory. In: Crestani, F., Ferragina, P., Sanderson, M. (eds.) SPIRE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4209, pp. 122–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Raman, R., Raman, V., Rao, S.: Succinct indexable dictionaries with applications to encoding k-ary trees and multisets. In: Proc. SODA, pp. 233–242 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson, S.E., Jones, K.S.: Relevance weighting of search terms. JASIST 27, 129–146 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S., Jones, S., Hancock-Beaulieu, M., Gatford, M.: Okapi at TREC-3. In: Harman, D.K. (ed.) Proc. 3rd TREC (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sadakane, K.: Succinct data structures for flexible text retrieval systems. J. Discrete Algorithms 5(1), 12–22 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Salton, G., Wong, A., Yang, C.S.: A vector space model for automatic indexing. Comm. ACM 18(11), 613–620 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Välimäki, N., Mäkinen, V.: Space-efficient algorithms for document retrieval. In: Ma, B., Zhang, K. (eds.) CPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4580, pp. 205–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Witten, I., Moffat, A., Bell, T.: Managing Gigabytes, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zobel, J., Moffat, A.: Inverted files for text search engines. ACM Computing Surveys 38(2), 1–56 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Culpepper, J.S., Navarro, G., Puglisi, S.J., Turpin, A. (2010). Top-k Ranked Document Search in General Text Databases. In: de Berg, M., Meyer, U. (eds) Algorithms – ESA 2010. ESA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6347. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15781-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15781-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15780-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15781-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics