Abstract
Fusion of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) images during TRUS guided prostate biopsy improves localization of the malignant tissues. Segmented prostate in TRUS and MRI improve registration accuracy and reduce computational cost of the procedure. However, accurate segmentation of the prostate in TRUS images can be a challenging task due to low signal to noise ratio, heterogeneous intensity distribution inside the prostate, and imaging artifacts like speckle noise and shadow. We propose to use texture features from approximation coefficients of Haar wavelet transform for propagation of a shape and appearance based statistical model to segment the prostate in a multi-resolution framework. A parametric model of the propagating contour is derived from Principal Component Analysis of prior shape and texture informations of the prostate from the training data. The parameters are then modified with prior knowledge of the optimization space to achieve optimal prostate segmentation. The proposed method achieves a mean Dice Similarity Coefficient value of 0.95±0.01, and mean segmentation time of 0.72±0.05 seconds when validated on 25 TRUS images, grabbed from video sequences, in a leave-one-out validation framework. Our proposed model performs computationally efficient accurate prostate segmentation in presence of intensity heterogeneity and imaging artifacts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Prostate Cancer Statistics - Key Facts (2009), http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/prostate
Abolmaesumi, P., Sirouspour, M.: Segmentation of Prostate Contours from Ultrasound Images. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 3, pp. 517–520 (2004)
Betrouni, N., Vermandel, M., Pasquier, D., Maouche, S., Rousseau, J.: Segmentation of Abdominal Ultrasound Images of the Prostate Using A priori Information and an Adapted Noise Filter. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 29, 43–51 (2005)
Chang, C.Y., Wu, Y.L., Tsai, Y.S.: Integrating the Validation Incremental Neural Network and Radial-Basis Function Neural Network for Segmenting Prostate in Ultrasound Images. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 198–203 (2009)
Cootes, T.F., Hill, A., Taylor, C.J., Haslam, J.: The Use of Active Shape Model for Locating Structures in Medical Images. Image and Vision Computing 12, 355–366 (1994)
Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G., Taylor, C.: Active Appearance Models. In: Burkhardt, H., Neumann, B. (eds.) ECCV 1998. LNCS, vol. 1407, pp. 484–498. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Cosío, F.A., Davies, B.L.: Automated Prostate Recognition: A Key Process for Clinically Effective Robotic Prostatectomy. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 37, 236–243 (1999)
Ding, M., Chen, C., Wang, Y., Gyacskov, I., Fenster, A.: Prostate Segmentation in 3D US Images Using the Cardinal-Spline Based Discrete Dynamic Contour. In: Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display, vol. 5029, pp. 69–76 (2003)
Ding, M., Gyacskov, I., Yuan, X., Drangova, M., Downey, D., Fenster, A.: Slice-Based Prostate Segmentation in 3D US Images Using Continuity Constraint. In: 27th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 662–665 (2006)
Ghanei, A., Soltanian-Zadeh, H., Ratkewicz, A., Yin, F.F.: A Three-Dimensional Deformable Model for Segmentation of Human Prostate from Ultrasound Images. Medical Physics 28, 2147–2153 (2001)
Gong, L., Pathak, S.D., Haynor, D.R., Cho, P.S., Kim, Y.: Parametric Shape Modeling Using Deformable Superellipses for Prostate Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 23, 340–349 (2004)
Knoll, C., Alcañiz, M., Monserrat, C., Grau, V., Juan, M.C.: Outlining of the Prostate Using Snakes with Shape Restrictions Based on the Wavelet Transform (doctoral thesis: Dissertation). Pattern Recognition 32, 1767–1781 (1999)
Ladak, H.M., Mao, F., Wang, Y., Downey, D.B., Steinman, D.A., Fenster, A.: Prostate Segmentation from 2D Ultrasound Images. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 4, pp. 3188–3191 (2000)
Larsen, R., Stegmann, M.B., Darkner, S., Forchhammer, S., Cootes, T.F., Ersbll, B.K.: Texture Enhanced Appearance Models. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 106, 20–30 (2007)
Liu, Y.J., Ng, W.S., Teo, M.Y., Lim, H.C.: Computerised Prostate Boundary Estimation of Ultrasound Images Using Radial Bas–Relief Method. Medical and Biology Engineering and Computing 35, 445–454 (1997)
Medina, R., Bravo, A., Windyga, P., Toro, J., Yan, P., Onik, G.: A 2D Active Appearance Model For Prostate Segmentation in Ultrasound Images. In: 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 3363–3366 (2005)
Petrou, M., Sevilla, P.G.: Image Processing: Dealing With Texture, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester (2006)
Shen, D., Zhan, Y., Davatzikos, C.: Segmentation of Prostate Boundaries from Ultrasound Images Using Statistical Shape Model. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22, 539–551 (2003)
Wolstenholme, C.B.H., Taylor, C.J.: Wavelet Compression of Active Appearance Models. In: Taylor, C., Colchester, A. (eds.) MICCAI 1999. LNCS, vol. 1679, pp. 544–554. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Yan, P., Xu, S., Turkbey, B., Kruecker, J.: Optimal Search Guided by Partial Active Shape Model for Prostate Segmentation in TRUS Images. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling, vol. 7261, pp. 72611G–72611G–11 (2009)
Zaim, A.: Automatic Segmentation of the Prostate from Ultrasound Data Using Feature-Based Self Organizing Map. In: Kalviainen, H., Parkkinen, J., Kaarna, A. (eds.) SCIA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3540, pp. 1259–1265. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ghose, S. et al. (2010). Texture Guided Active Appearance Model Propagation for Prostate Segmentation. In: Madabhushi, A., Dowling, J., Yan, P., Fenster, A., Abolmaesumi, P., Hata, N. (eds) Prostate Cancer Imaging. Computer-Aided Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Intervention. Prostate Cancer Imaging 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6367. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15989-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15989-3_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15988-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15989-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)