Skip to main content

Maintenance Scenarios for Distributed Application Infrastructures

Concepts with the Focus on Functional and Data Integrity

  • Conference paper
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 64))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 704 Accesses

Abstract

Whenever complex business scenarios terminate prematurely due to an error or the unavailability of applications, the system administration is forced to react as swiftly as possible. The failure of a single component can rapidly impair the whole application infrastructure and can cause serious damage. Failures must be identified, dependencies considered and processes restarted for functional and data integrity to be regained on the business process level. We presented mechanisms for more transparency and better control so that further incidents after problems are known will be avoided. This time we will concentrate on maintenance scenarios by the use of M3DB. Maintenance scenarios for distributed application infrastructures are more complex and need a stronger and more effective integration of technical and business issues. The more maintainable a system landscape is, the higher its availability, reliability and evolvability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alonso, J., Torres, J., Gavaldà, R.: Predicting web server crashes: A case study in comparing prediction algorithms. In: ICAS The Fifth International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. BPMN: Business Process Model Notation, OMG, Not-for-profit computer industry consortium, Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org

  3. Breivold, H.P., Crnkovic, I., Eriksson, P.: Evaluating Software Evolvability. In: Proc. 7th Conf. on Software Engineering Research and Practice in Sweden (SERPS’07), pp. 96–103. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Côté, I., Heisel, M.: Supporting Evolution by Models, Components and Patterns. In: 1. Workshop des GI-Arbeitskreises Langlebige Softwaresysteme (L2S2), vol. 537. CEUR-WS.org (2009) ISSN 1613-0073

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Peter: The Entity-Relationship Model–Toward a Unified View of Data. In: ACM Transactions on Database Systems, pp. 9–36. ACM-Press, New York (1976) ISSN 0362-5915

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daute, O., Conrad, S.: Supporting Complex Business Information Systems. In: 13th International Conference on Business Information Systems. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daute, O., Conrad, S.: Maintainability and control of long-lived enterprise solutions. In: 1. Workshop des GI-Arbeitskreises Langlebige Softwaresysteme (L2S2), vol. 537. CEUR-WS.org (2009) ISSN 1613-0073

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daute, O., Conrad, S.: Activity Control in Application Landscapes. In: 1st Intl. Conference on Cloud Computing. Cloudcomp. LNICST, vol. 34, pp. 83–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daute, O.: Introducing Real-Time Business CASE Database, Approach to improving system maintenance of complex application landscapes. In: ICEIS 11th Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daute, O.: Representation of Business Information Flow with an Extension for UML. In: ICEIS 6th Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Economist Intelligence Unit: Coming to grips with IT risk, A report from the Economist Intelligence Unit, White Paper (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gartner Research Group: TCO, Total Cost of Ownership, Information Technology Research (1987), http://www.gartner.com

  13. IEEE, Computer Society Committee: IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, IEEE Std 610.12-1990 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. ITIL, IT Infrastructure Library, ITSMF, Information Technology Service Management Forum, http://www.itsmf.net

  15. Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., Scheer, A.-W.: EPC, Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeßketten (EPK). In: Scheer, A.-W. (ed.) Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik, vol. 89. Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kobbacy, K.A.H., Murthy, D.N.: Prabhakar: Complex System Maintenance Handbook. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Neill, G.: Maintainability: Theory and Practice. In: NASA ISHEM Conference (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.J.: Software Product Line Engineering - Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Papazoglou, M., Heuvel, J.: Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues. International Journal on Very Large Data Bases (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosemann, M.: Process-oriented Administration of Enterprise Systems, ARC SPIRT project, Queensland University of Technology (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Riebisch, M., Bode, S.: Software-Evolvability. In: GI Informatik Spektrum, Technische Universität Ilmenau, vol. 32(4) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Riebisch, M., Brcina, R., Bode, S.: Optimisation Process for Maintaining Evolvability during Software Evolution. ECBS (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schelp, J.: Winter, Robert: Business Application Design and Enterprise Service Design: A Comparison. Int. J. Service Sciences 3(4) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. SOA: Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture Committee Specification (2006), http://www.oasis-open.org

  25. Summerville, Nicholas: Basic Reliability: An introduction to Reliability Engineering, AuthorHouse, Indiana, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stammel, J., Reussner, R.: KAMP: Karlsruhe Architectural Maintainability Prediction. In: 1. Workshop des GI-Arbeitskreises Langlebige Softwaresysteme (L2S2), vol. 537. CEUR-WS.org (2009) ISSN 1613-0073

    Google Scholar 

  27. Svatoš, O.: Conceptual Process Modeling Language: Regulative Approach, Department of Information Technologies, University of Economics, Czech Republic (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. TOGAF, 9.0: The Open Group Architecture Framework, Vendor- and technology-neutral consortium, The Open GROUP (2009), http://www.togaf.org

  29. UML: Unified Modeling Language, Not-for-profit computer industry consortium, Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org

  30. Vouk, M.: Cloud Computing – Issues, Research and Implementations. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language, YAWL Foundation. Not-for-profit computer industry consortium, http://www.yawlfoundation.org/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Daute, O., Conrad, S. (2010). Maintenance Scenarios for Distributed Application Infrastructures. In: Forbrig, P., Günther, H. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 64. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16101-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16101-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16100-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16101-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics