Abstract
Perfection has been used as a criteria to select rearrangement scenarios since 2004. However, there is a fundamental bias towards extant species in the original definition: ancestral species are not bound to perfection. Here we develop a new theory of perfection that takes an egalitarian view of species, and apply it to the complex evolution of mammal chromosome X.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bérard, S., Bergeron, A., Chauve, C.: Conservation of combinatorial structures in evolution scenarios. In: Lagergren, J. (ed.) RECOMB-WS 2004. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 3388, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Bérard, S., Bergeron, A., Chauve, C., Paul, C.: Perfect sorting by reversals is not always difficult. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biology Bioinform. 4(1), 4–16 (2007)
Bérard, S., Chateau, A., Chauve, C., Paul, C., Tannier, E.: Perfect DCJ rearrangement. In: Nelson, C.E., Vialette, S. (eds.) RECOMB-CG 2008. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 5267, pp. 158–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Bergeron, A., Chauve, C., de Montgolfier, F., Raffinot, M.: Computing Common Intervals of k Permutations, with Applications to Modular Decomposition of Graphs. In: Brodal, G.S., Leonardi, S. (eds.) ESA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3669, pp. 779–790. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Bourque, G., Pevzner, P.A., Tesler, G.: Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: Lessons from human, mouse, and rat genomes. Genome Research 14(4), 507–516 (2004)
Braga, M.D., Gautier, C., Sagot, M.-F.: An asymmetric approach to preserve common intervals while sorting by reversals. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 4(16) (2009)
Figeac, M., Varré, J.-S.: Sorting by reversals with common intervals. In: Jonassen, I., Kim, J. (eds.) WABI 2004. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 3240, pp. 26–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Heber, S., Stoye, J.: Finding all common intervals of k permutations. In: Amir, A., Landau, G.M. (eds.) CPM 2001. LNCS, vol. 2089, pp. 207–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Hsu, W.-L.: PC-trees vs. PQ-trees. In: Wang, J. (ed.) COCOON 2001. LNCS, vol. 2108, pp. 207–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Hsu, W.-L., McConnell, R.M.: PC trees and circular-ones arrangements. Theor. Comput. Sci. 296(1), 99–116 (2003)
Landau, G.M., Parida, L., Weimann, O.: Using PQ trees for comparative genomics. In: Apostolico, A., Crochemore, M., Park, K. (eds.) CPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3537, pp. 128–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Sagot, M.-F., Tannier, E.: Perfect sorting by reversals. In: Wang, L. (ed.) COCOON 2005. LNCS, vol. 3595, pp. 42–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Tesler, G.: GRIMM: genome rearrangements web server. Bioinformatics 18(3), 492–493 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ouangraoua, A., Bergeron, A., Swenson, K.M. (2010). Ultra-Perfect Sorting Scenarios. In: Tannier, E. (eds) Comparative Genomics. RECOMB-CG 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6398. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16181-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16181-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16180-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16181-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)