Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 112))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Producing high-quality software has been one of the greatest challenges of the development market in the last few years. The software testing is the essence of the quality assurance, but the implementation of this activity is still difficult due to may factors. This paper presents some factors that influence on the adoption of a testing process. Some of these factors were outlined in the literature, and others were selected empirically based on the work experience obtained in a large company. We present the results obtained in the experiments that compare the software testing performance when implemented considering a formal testing process and when carried out in an ad-hoc way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rodrigues., A., Pinheiro, P., Rodrigues, M.M., et al.: Towards the Selection of Testable Use Cases and a Real Experience. In: Second World Summit on the Knowledge Society, WSKS 2009, Grécia. Best Practices for the Knowledge Society. Knowledge, Learning, Development and Technology for All, vol. 49, pp. 513–521 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rodrigues, A., Pinheiro, P., Albuquerque, A.B.: The definiton of a testing process to small sized companies: the Brazilian scenario. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), Porto (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rodrigues, A., Pinheiro, P., Rodrigues, M.M., et al.: Applying a multicriteria model for selection of test use cases: a use of experience. International Journal Social and Humanistic Computing 1, 246–260 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bahulkar, A., Kelkar, R.: Opportunities in System testing. In: Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference Practice and Research Techniques - mutation (taicpart-mutation 2007), p.133 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. CMMI – Capability Maturity Model Integration, http://www.cmmi.de/cmmi_v1.2/browser.html

  6. Ryu, H., Ryu, D.-K., Baik, J.: A Strategic Test Process Improvement Approach Using an Ontological Description for MND-TMM. In: Seventh IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS 2008), pp. 561–566 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Londesbrough, I.: A Test Process for all Lifecycles. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop (ICSTW) pp. 328–331 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maldonado, J.C.: Critérios Potenciais Usos: Uma Construção ao Teste Estrutural de Software. Tese de Doutorado, DCA/FEE/UNICAMP, Campinas, SP (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, M., Thompson, N.: The Keystone to Support a Generic Test Process: icstw. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, pp. 343–353 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. MPS.BR – Melhoria no Processo de Desenvolvimento de Software, http://www.softex.br/mpsbr/_home/default.asp

  11. NBR ISO 9001 - Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas.– Sistema de Gestão da Qualidade – Requisitos, Rio de Janeiro (2008), http://www.abnt

  12. Rational Unified Process®. Rational Software Corporation. Versão 2002.05.00. Copyright © (1987 – 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. SEI, Capability Maturity Model Integration, Version 1.1 Staged Representation (2002), http://www.sei.cmu.edu

  14. Yuan, Y., Gu, S.: Research and Establishment of Quality Cost Oriented Software Testing Model. In: Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, CCECE 2006, pp. 2410–2415 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weimin, Z., Bosheng, Z., Wenjie, L.: Model-Based Time Estimate of Software Test Processes. In: International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCom 2007, pp. 4946–4949 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rodrigues, A., Bessa, A., Pinheiro, P.R. (2010). Barriers to Implement Test Process in Small-Sized Companies. In: Lytras, M.D., Ordonez de Pablos, P., Ziderman, A., Roulstone, A., Maurer, H., Imber, J.B. (eds) Organizational, Business, and Technological Aspects of the Knowledge Society. WSKS 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 112. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16324-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16324-1_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16323-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16324-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics