Abstract
Recent development in Web shows a significant trend towards more user participation, massive use of new devices including portables, and high interactivity. The user participation goes hand in hand with inclusion of all potential user groups — also with special needs. However, we claim that albeit all the effort towards accessibility, it has not yet found an appopriate reflection among stakeholders of the “Top Web Applications” nor their users. This leads to undesired causes — the business-driven Web without all user participation is not a really democratic medium and, actually, does not comply with the original characteristics of Web 2.0. The paper tries to identify perspectives of further development including standardization processes and technical obstacles behind. It also shows ways and techniques to cope with the challenge based on our own research and development in accessible graphics and dialog-based systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Faulkner, S.: Google chrome 2.0 accessibility improvements? (2009), http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/?p=104 (retrieved 2010/30/06)
Frank, J.: Web accessibility for the blind: Corporate social responsibility? or litigation avoidance? In: Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences, p. 284 (2008)
Fredj, Z.B., Duce, D.A.: Grassml: Accessible smart schematic diagrams for all. In: Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics, pp. 49–55. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (June 2003)
Inc. Google. Google’s accessibility mission. http://www.google.com/accessibility/ (2010) (retrieved 2010/30/06)
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. Authoring tool accessibility guidelines (atag) overview (2010), http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/atag.php (retrieved 2010/02/07)
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. Web accessibility initiative (wai) (2010), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ (retrieved 2010/02/07)
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. Web content accessibility guidelines (wcag) overview (2010), http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.php (retrieved 2010/02/07)
Kaczmarek, K.: Electrotactile display for computer graphics to blind. Research Report 5-R01-EY10019-08, University of Wisconsin (2004)
Kopeček, I., Bártek, L.: Web pages for blind people — generating web-based presentations by means of dialogue. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4061, pp. 114–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Kopeček, I., Ošlejšek, R.: G.a.t.e. to accessibility of computer graphics. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 295–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Kurze, M.: Tdraw: a computer-based tactile drawing tool for blind people. In: Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Assistive technologies, Vancouver, pp. 131–138 (1996)
Lardinois, F.: Top 10 consumer web apps of 2009 (2009), http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_consumer_web_apps_of_2009.php (retrieved 2010/30/06)
Mathis, R.M.: Constraint scalable vector graphics, accessibility and the semantic web. In: SoutheastCon Proceedings, pp. 588–593. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)
TyfloCentrum Brno o. p. s. and SONS Czech Republic. Blind friendly web — web page accessibility (on czech) (2010), http://blindfriendly.cz
O’Reilly, T.: What is web 2.0. design patterns and business models for the next generation of software (September 2005), http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
Ošlejšek, R.: Annotation of pictures by means of graphical ontologies. In: Proceedings of ICOMP 2009, pp. 296–300. CSREA Press (2009)
Weiss, T.C.: Microsoft’s new bing search engine — a graphical wonder (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bártek, L., Ošlejšek, R., Pitner, T. (2010). Is Accessibility an Issue in the Knowledge Society? Modern Web Applications in the Light of Accessibility. In: Lytras, M.D., Ordonez de Pablos, P., Ziderman, A., Roulstone, A., Maurer, H., Imber, J.B. (eds) Organizational, Business, and Technological Aspects of the Knowledge Society. WSKS 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 112. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16324-1_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16324-1_40
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16323-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16324-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)